Because in a group that small, everyone's watching everyone. Yes communism can work in small groups but when applied to a group larger than a single illager the system starts to break apart. You can get alway with it in large groups, becuse they have to have more impersonal governance.
Not to mention men also have better spatial awareness. Now I know this study only says that heterosexual men drive better, but I'm only using this sentence to pad this out because I feel the link itself makes the point well enough.
Science actually suggests that men actually feel about half as much pain as women do. The exception is child birth since the mother's body has spent the entire gestation building up natural painkillers in preparation.
There's one simple reason communism can't work, simple human nature. Humans, like all animals, seek to amass influence and resources for themselves and no matter what system we use, someone will always use their postition to acquire them, the difference is that under capitalism, it's the businessmen, under communism, it's the government. People will always do this and changes the system will only change who succeeds and how.
Yeah, because all men are respected solely because they have a penis. I'm going to tell you a secret, a secret so secret that no one's ever even descovered it. no, it's time it got out and here it is. get ready to have you're mind blown into a pulsar.
...men don't get respect simply for having a penis.
Shocking isn't it? Yes, it's almost as though people are expected to earn respect by something like, I don't know, doing something other complaining about every little thing and expecting everyone else to go out of their way to fix it. Stop the world, this word is offensive and nobodies doing anything until I get an apology.
Simply because our bodies are designed to be able to consume meat does not mean that we are perfectly adapted to it, in order to have and system be multifunctional inevitably requires compromise between the two. The fact that the human digestive system is more optimized for plant matter means that the ratio of meat to plant matter that is consumed is tipped in favour of the latter, but does not mean that the former is not meant to be ingested. In the early days of man meat was hard to come by, but was desired, while meanwhile fruits and vegetables and grains were much more plentiful and easier to acquire so the digestive tract developed to accomadate meat while still being suited to plant matter. Your entire argument hinges on all omnivores preferring meat but most omnivores in fact prefer plant matter, but bolster this with meat
If production workers take the whole of the products value, that means administrative positions would bring no benefit to those who hold them, as such they will remain vacant, and the economy would collapse. Sure the executives are greedy but so is everyone else, it's basic human nature. Capitalism works precisely BECAUSE of this greed, using it to motivate peopleto strive toward innovation and efficiency and thus leading to greater economic prosperity, because under capitalism, the best way to make money is to line everyone else's pockets and that's precisely what the corporations do. If we remove this motive, we dispose of the most successful economic system the world has ever seen.
People don't try to sell their sweat, they try to sell the product of their sweat. Rarely are laborers paid what their sweat-product is worth. Instead, they are paid the minimum wage and most of the value of their work is stolen by the person who merely organized them.
1/ Most production workers don't provide all the labor or any of the materials for the product.
2/ There are workers who make above minimum wage.
Did you know that men are actually just as sensitive as women, and that the main difference is a double standard in our society whereby women are encouraged to make a big detail about everything while men are expected to just take it, thus men put on the illusion that they are unaffected by such things as relationships to avoid ridicule?
You've made this same point 3 times already, not counting all you supports and disputing. The fact is that the economy is complex and is not controlled solely by 1 factor. Did you ever consider that maybe there is more to stress than whether you have to stand. It's clear that all you want is an excuse not to become employed, to merely live off welfare your entire life and live better than everyone for it. The fact of the matter is that you merely use large, archaic words to hide the fact that your entire position is based entirely on a complete misunderstanding of economics as a whole.
That is merely because once they get into office, they become privy to information that makes their campaign promises unreachable, or at least disasterous. It's easy to say you're going to end world hunger until you actually start trying, and then you realize that the problem is far more complicated than you initially believed.
You would have a point, except for one big, rather obvious detail, you are playing with more than one person. In any online game play dozens of people, at least, not just one person, so you're forced to adapt your strategy to cover up it's weaknesses. In fact if you only played one person, you'd still develop new tactics, because that's what happens when two intelligent beings interact with each other, we don't use a flow chart to think, hell not even AIs do anymore.
It's a game, not a real war, there is a difference. In fact even in real war people have been known to be kind to each other, and they're killing each other, so do you really think that playing a game is more anti-social the actually shooting a man?
