CreateDebate


Jomiyatan992's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Jomiyatan992's arguments, looking across every debate.
2 points

God is just an ideal...all humans love to believe in something...

In fact, people need to believe in something, follow a set of rules that is laid for them, so that they can go on with their lives happily and be reassured that they can get into paradise after they are dead, and not just left rotting in the ground. At least they can console themselves that they still exist in some form or another.

Besides, if there's a God, what makes you think he doesn't love us? Epidemics and natural disasters are part of nature. I may sound selfish at this point in time, but if there are no such disasters, there would be overpopulation and everyone will just die due to lack of space and food.

I don't think we can really treat everyone of all ages equally, unless you mean mature adults (above 18/21).

If its in terms of human rights, such as the ability to vote, I believe all should be treated the same.

Yet, I believe that exclusive rights still should be given to the 'elderly'. Sure, some are healthy enough to continue being employed and earn their own keep, but age has caused many to be weakened by diseases/afflictions that are common to old age. In this case, I believe that for issues like health care, or minor issues such as priority seats in public transport should be catered more exclusively for the elderly.

Yeah...that's what I'm puzzled about. I found this question in this list of essay questions that we are given, and the only 'account' I can give is the statistics for how much these films fared in terms of box office ratings/money made. We are suppose to give 5 points, 1 point each para, excluding conclusion and intro, but other than the above mentioned point, I can't think of anything else.

Pedophiles have lost their right to be normal once they have committed something against nature. It just isn't right to go for underaged kids and do stuff to them. Pedophiles are sick. They should not be even allowed to live in society like everyone else, so that they can keep on preying on little kids. No one would feel safe when they know that someone like that is living in the neighbourhood.

3 points

I believe that it's bad as it brings a totally wrong portrayal of love to teens. They might think that the over-possessive nature and stalker-ish tendencies of Edward should be condoned, just because he's Edward. The epitome of coolness and well, lover boy. If you happen to imagine this scenerio that happens in real life, to you, but not with an ideal guy whom you are almost equally obsessed with, it's with a normal guy, (Well, normal as a stalker can be...) what would you feel? Terrified? Of course, it's a story book. If one knows how to distance themselves from it and not totally follow its social norms, the series isn't extremely bad. Just harmless. Then again, there are some people who are so into the plot, and think that some things that deviate from social norms are good, then there's a problem.

3 points

Yes, I would. Yes, the baby is a life, and we have no right to forfeit it. But, I believe that no human would want to be born imperfect. Disabled people who have emerged victorious from their demons and the society's condemnations have gone through a lot of trials and tribulations. Which results in their optimism and gratitude towards life. Not everyone can do that. Besides, bringing a special needs baby burdens everyone. And no one wants to be a burden to anyone. I may sound callous at this point, but in the long term, how do you ensure that no harm comes to it? You can't be around for it forever!

It's always the self-esteem issue, isn't it? We always say pride comes before a high fall, but that doesn't mean we can't pat our backs for a good piece of work done! Either we lack confidence, or that we are afraid of being overconfident. Besides, with all the belittling from our parents, (with good intentions, I hope), it's really hard to actually not say that too much 'power' is good. After all, power corrupts. We avoid all these stuff and attempt to hide our abilities is because we are afraid of being viewed as an outcast from our friends. We want to stand out, but we are afraid that others may not take it as well. But seriously, if they are true friends, then they would really want you to succeed, isn't it? But human beings are creatures that are very much prone to jealousy, and friends are humans as well.

Gosh. I think I'm digressing. >.<

I would choose personality, of course. Maybe not solely based on personality, but definitely not just on looks. I mean, even if the person's beautiful and all, if he is a self-centred pig, narcissistic, and totally rude, I doubt one can actually survive with him for a year, let alone a whole lifetime.

I agree. Doesn't this brings us to the long-debated issue of how does well do examinations assess the intelligence of students? The education uses examinations to assess the 'weak' points of students, but, do they really make the students learn? Not only that...the education system is supposed to educate the young, teaching them knowledge. But, what knowledge? Knowledge that is only applicable to examinations? Or is it life skills that the students need? I think think that it is the latter, and the education system is sorely lacking in this aspect. What's the point of education then?

2 points

Lols. It depends if you look pretty enough, isn't it? Besides, it might be more prevalent in Western countries than Eastern countries. But NO, I wouldn't do it because firstly, it really depends on your looks, and I'm am sure that mine is not desirable enough. Lols. Secondly, it's weird! I mean, do you REALLY need THAT money?! It's almost equivalent to prostitution, except that this is more publicized. You are selling your freaking body!! -.- Of course, some people do not regard virginity as something to be given to their bethrothed on their wedding night, neither do I, but wouldn't it be better to pop your cherry to someone you actually know?

2 points

Dads are important since...well, there's a reason for people to keep emphasizing the need of a nuclear family with the mum and dad intact, isn't it? As shown in various psychological studies, regular contact with a father figure leads to fewer psychological problems in girls and fewer behavioral problems in boys. For low-income children, this contact also leads to a lower chance of criminal activity and improved language and reasoning skills. Therefore, this proves that dads are important. =)

Citations: http://www.findcounseling.com/help/news/ 2008/02/review_supports_importance_of_active_father_figures.html

As for your first question, yes, I'm a girl, but that doesn't mean that I asked this question JUST BECAUSE I'm a girl. It was a question from my General Paper, and that I felt that this was a debatable issue.

Onto the next question. Yes, of course having a dad around for a father figure in your life is great. But, having a father doesn't mean that he can be a real father to his kids. In this modern society, parents work long hours, and they do not spend enough time with their kids. So if the father is not long around enough to bond with the child, what kind of father figure is he? Some fathers are alcoholics or drug abusers, etc. For situations like that, don't you think that dads are not important?

Of course, I'm not saying that dads are not important at all. But it really depends on what type of 'dad' you get, don't you think?

For starters, education system in several countries, such as Singapore encourage ‘spoon-feeding’, which kills creativity. Creative thinking and individuality are part of the criteria that determines whether you last long in the workforce. Students have assignments on internet portals, other than work printed on paper. Despite the progress to using technology, the work is banal and it does not truly allow a student to be original. Of course, modern day technology has the power to kill all creativity or be a catalyst towards greater creativity. However, there are too many restrictions to where one cannot really do anything at all. Therefore, as the education system stunts the creativity levels of students, it is not effective in meeting the needs of the young.

Next, because of the unsuccessful education system, there exists a need for tutors, since students feel that they do not stand to learn much or understand what their teachers are explaining about. In countries like Singapore, there is a rising trend in students seeking tuition, to the extent of forking out an exorbitant amount every month for tuition fees. If the education system caters to the needs of the students, then why do they need to seek external help?

Lastly, the education system only prepares the students for examinations, and the other aspects of the child are neglected, such as moral education. Most of the time, schools are focused on their national ranking, and fail to inculcate moral values to the child. Yes, the students are well-prepared academically, but when it comes to their character, they lack social etiquette.

Yes. Nowadays, there are more people getting As in international exams such as A’level and O’level, as compared to the past. Even though the standard has been raised, but there the number of students who manage to score As is increasing steadily. Therefore, as compared to the past, the education system has equipped students with the necessary skills, as shown through their excellent track record.

3 points

Cigarette smoking should be banned! Not only it affects the health of the smoker himself, it also affects the people around him as well, making them passive smokers. If the smokers themselves smoke despite knowing the consequences, but they can't force others who do not want to be afflicted to inhale their foul smell!!

What I'm thinking of is similar to this, but not with the watching porn part though. >.<

People who can't draw would be able to fulfill their interest in drawing, in some sort of way, since our imagination is well, imaginative enough to let us create graphics that, for non-artistic people, are hard to draw out.

Think of the advances in photography this could be! Images can be captured in just that second, creating wonders. Often, we want to capture a moving object with the camera, but do not have the skill to do that. With this bionic eye, we can do these stuff!

I think almost everything wonderful can be done with the bionic eye. But the problem is, how do you manage to get the brain to actually send the information to this 'bionic' eye and be connected to it in the first place?

Another 'thing' that I want science to create is the ability to shape-shift. Although it might be linked to other ethical problems and crime problems, but still, let's focus on the positive aspects. With the ability or gene to shape-shift, we can actually be whoever we want! Defeating the purpose for any artificial beauty products or modifications such as cosmetic surgery and make-up. People with low self-esteem levels wouldn't want to seek cosmetic surgery or slather themselves with a thick layer of make-up. Or dye their hair and damage it. Wouldn't it be great to be able to change yourself at will? Of course, this is a really materialistic idea, and that there are more cons than pros, but it's a nice ability to have!^^



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]