I totally agree with you. Downloading music shouldn't be illegal, however in some countries it is banned to download music. I think that it is just people's rights to download music from the Internet and even share with it if they want. Why some time ago it was legal to download music but now it is going to be illegal? It is just stupid at first to allow to download music and then to ban it. You can't take off a thing which you have already given.

i agree with the statement that money makes our life better. thanks money we can go to school, university and then we can achieve our goals. especially nowadays money is very important. in this world full of corruption without money we are not able to do anything

Tima just look around: can you see a lot of children who stay on the street or work in markets asking some money? yes, there are many of them in each country! so where is the help for orphanes? even if they are not orphans there are many children who prefer to live by themselves. for example children from unhappy families, where parents are alcoholics. what they can do if they arenot happy with their parents they go and work and earn money for providing themselves. that is why children should be permitted to work.

there are some free schools, but mostly they are not good in education. Some of these schools which are situated in poor countries need in educated teachers. so why children should go there? just for sitting and meeting with friends, spending time for nothing. what if they are orphans and nobody takes care about them what they would choose: education and hunger or work and food? what if they don't have any choice they just have to work for surviving

I don't totally agree with you. The matter is that children should think about their future that is why they are working. They don't have money for education; it is better for them if they earn money and spent them on food and other necessities.

but i am for policy using guns. for them it is ok. furthermore, there is a corruption that can allow every person to buy license. anyway allowing everyone to use guns is terrible and unadmittable. everyone will live in fear that someone can kill them and the level of deaths will be increased. i don't think that allowing guns for everyone is not the best way of protecting yourself.

guns have already created, but they are not for everybody. they are only for people who have rights to have guns such as policy. They have learnt about how to use it or when to use and they could control themselves. according to simple people not everyone is able to use it and because of little mistake they can shoot another person. people will suffer due to not their fault.

you get my idea. It is policy's work to find out criminals and if it is need to use guns for catching them. If everyone use guns then policy will lose their force. moreover people will be able to use guns anytime they, it means that people will live in fear that in any time in any place someone can kill them

yes you are right. guns are the main reason of crime. according to statistics there is increasing number of people who have guns and today we see increasing level of crime. In addition people who have guns can hurt not only the person who hurt them but also other people who were near this action. I think that guns should be used by policy and it is their work to find criminals.

but if people have no guns then nothing like crime would happen, nobody would be murdered and the number of deaths would be decreased. Just imagine that everyone has guns and then why we need in policy? They will not have a force under criminals. If person drink alcohol then he will lose his control and if someone annoy him then he will just in shot him and he would be died. Everyone has rights on life.

but if people have no guns then nothing like crime would happen, nobody would be murdered and the number of deaths would be decreased. Just imagine that everyone has guns and then why we need in policy? They will not have a force under criminals. If person drink alcohol then he will lose his control and if someone annoy him then he will just in shot him and he would be died. Everyone has rights on live.

but there are some cases when people cannot control themselves and they kill or hurt people by guns and later they blame themselves about what they have done and they pay for this mistake by their life in prison.

I don't think that all people should have guns. It is admittedly to have them for policy and that is enough. If everyone have guns there would be just mess in the world!

but if person will make some changes in fashion then it is not fashion at all. fashion is made for everyone if you changed it then it is an individual clothing which is comfortable for you. that is why fashion is not important. people choose clothes for them by themselves.

here you are: decorations and clothes must first match the style of women. each person would better wear something unusual, but not fashionable clothes that are worn by everyone. in this case you will merge with everyone and nobody will notice you. but if you are creative and wear some interesting clothes that are very comfortable and also attract attention

but outlook is not so important, the most important thing is inside beauty and to feel yourself very comfortable. what would you choose a comfortable clothes or fashionable but not comfortable?

i think that you are wrong people say that fashion is not important and that is true. in addition fashion don't worth so much money that are spent for buying these clothes.

you know in some way you are right, but if person who is very fashionable wants to work in fashion organization then s/he can go by himself.

you know there are a lot of clothes which are not comfortable!for example long dresses which were fashionable in summer. you know they are not so comfortable!there are also other such clothes which are not comfortable!

i totally agree with you!it is not important to follow fashion! it is more important to feel yourself comfortable.

let me sum up, it is good to spend time with them, they can cure some pains, they are used in policy and they help firemen. in addition they can predict different natural disasters and it is good for people. if people will always take care about them then nothing like biting and killing would happen. i think that there are some medicines which are against of allergy!

then person should think before buying cats and dogs. they should think about future life. anyway if it is difficult for person to take care about animals and its children then he can sell them to another person or give them like a gift. anyway i think that there are more benefits than disadvantages.

so it is the fault of people! i don't think that it depends on care about cats and dogs. this is another question it depends on personality. if people will not take care about them then nothing will change. i mean some crazy people will continue using them like meat. on the other hand, you know the fat of dogs is helpful for people's health.(how terrible it sounds anyway it is true). in addition cats and dogs can predict earthquakes. they run from one side to another. it is good for people. they can avoid bad consequences.

so you are right that this is a people's fault and responsibility. that is why we should continue taking care about them. i think that they are very useful for us. as i said we can spent we them a lot of time and have pleasure. they can distress and recover some pains. so i just can't understand your point of view we should care about them because it is our responsibility or we need in them?

but if people began taking care about them then they should continue doing it. people will teach them what is good and what is bad. they will learn how to behave in front of people. people should care about them and teach them in order to protect kids and people from biting and death. moreover cats can even help person to recover. they can distress and cure some illnesses.

people began to take care about cats and dogs because they are helpful for us. you know that dogs are used in policy and they also can help firemen. They look for people and there are a lot of cases when they find out them. as for dogs and cats that are in the street, so it is the fault of person. if s/he began taking care about them then s/he should continue caring, but to not throw them away.

i think that cats and dogs were, are and always will be people's friends. That is why we should take care about them. We can have a fun with them: play different games and walk. i don't see anything bad of continuing to take care about them.

but it will take time for taking some advantages of using computers at school. according to one article: "another con of educational technology is that school administrators tend to spend large amounts of money to integrate computers into schools when the effectiveness of programs on students achievement is unclear". so there are a lot of disadvantages that is why i think it is better to use papers. we are using them during many years and we don't have any damages because of it.

but again what about eyesight and radiation?we can get cancer because of spending a lot of time in front computers. i am not against of using computers at home, but using it at schools is not beneficial. it is a modern life, but not all the teachers can use computers!in addition it is difficult to look after all pupils during the class. teachers should always come separately to each person in order to explain different tasks. moreover, there are some sites that are false. how can children know to what believe and to what not!

according to the experts children should be banned from using computers in schools until they are nine-years-old because the early use of technology is destroying their attention spans!here is an argument. even scientist are against of using computers at school.

in my point of view computers are not so useful for pupils at school. it will disturb children from education. during classes they can use computers for their own aims like playing games, especially Internet! children will be able to enter to every site which they want so they will not study they will entertain at classes. it would be better to use papers!

i wonder if you use this cactus?in my opinion the majority don't use it!computers make people's lives easier. we can use it at homes, but not at school, at every lessons.

give an example of protecting things!do you think all the people use them? many schools have them in order to teach children to be able to use computers further. this is 21 century and we should know computer skills for getting good job. government allows us to use computers because it is easier to solve problems with computer. even if we need in computers we still suffer from it.

just think a little! would you choose hard way, but not harmful and dangerous or you would better choose easy way, but with harmful and dangerous consequences?

i quiet agree with the opinion that it is easier to use computers in order to save papers, it means that we also save trees. But, on the other hand, computers have bad influence on our health!

let it be... anyway right now it is useful for me. I care about my study and i am trying not to late to the lessons, that is why i eat quickly fast food. in addition as i said above it is practical and economical. it saves our time, which we can use on something important. furthermore if people are using fast food then it means and proves that fast food is not so dangerous, but vice versa it is comfortable.

yes i am because i eat it and after i don't feel hungry. if you are so concerned about your health then it is up to you! let's say that each person will decide by himself to eat fast food or no. as for me i will stay on my own view that people can't live without fast food and it will exist forever.

but it will not be enough for our organism. i quiet agree with you, but in real the majority prefers to eat fast food, not milk products and porridges. as for me i just can't eat any porridges, i dislike them, so i prefer fast food, which is very tasty. if fast food is very harmful for people's life then why it still exists? because people need in it. After milk products we will become hungry again and we will need in food again. it is not practical and economic.

yes i know it. anyway if we look on the other hand i guess that you are student and do you wanna say that you don't eat fast food?i am sure that you have a lot of other things expect cooking if you live alone. in addition the majority uses fast food every day, despite of the fact that it is harmful for our health!can you just imagine our life without fast food?

it is the cheapest and quickest way of eating and that is enough! it is better to eat something like fast food then don't eating anything at all!being hungry is not good too! what if you don't have any time for having a meal and you have a lot of work to do!

if people are poisoned because of fast food, then why fast food is still alive? why it is so widespread? because it is very comfortable! you can buy it wherever you want and whenever you want. as for me it is good and very fast and i never was poisoned from fast food.

I am for fast food. Even if it is harmful for our health, it is very fast and tasty. After fast food you will not feel yourself hungry.

but there more opportunities to be successful abroad. so people who don't know English can improve their skills going abroad. You know that if you are surrounded by foreign people and if everything around you is unknown then you will get used to them very fast, it means that you will learn foreign languages very quick. in addition, today it is very important to know English, so i am sure that the majority knows English. furthermore, if you so cared with patriotism, then people who study abroad can show the advantages of their native country, their culture, to make their country and nation very famous. What about freedom...there are also good sides of it. you will be independent, you become make decisions by yourself, so do think is it bad? moreover it depends on person if he wants to achieve his goals then he will, but if he wants to entertain then it is up to him. if this person respects his parents then he will study!

i said the majority stays abroad and i am not against of it, because they widespread their horizons in different spheres. what they can achieve staying just in own country? going abroad you will develop yourself and as i said above it is possible to open different organizations abroad which refer to your own country and to improve the economical system of your country. anyway we are speaking about education abroad...and there is nothing bad of getting it abroad. there is possibility of getting grant abroad. It will good for your family, they will not care about paying a lot of money for education in native country, because there is less possibilities of getting grant here! further, studying abroad will help you to improve your language skills and it will be good in your resume which will give you more possibilities ti find good job!

yes, the majority who study abroad stay there. But what can we do if the salary abroad is higher and there more advantages for person abroad then in its own country. Moreover people mostly think about their life and providing themselves, not the country. I wonder to know would you prefer to stay abroad with high salary and more opportunities for your bright future or you will go home and try to survive with low salary? as for me i like studying abroad: i can make a lot of new friends, i can widespread my horizons, i can see a lot of interesting places, i will develop myself! is it bad?

I don't totally agree with you. You even say by yourself that people studying abroad can take a good education and knowledge. so isn't it good for person? we develop ourselves, we learn a lot. in addition it is not necessary to develop not your country, people can open an organization abroad that relates to theirs own country.

i think that love is such thing which can be felt in different conditions. and if people find each other from network then they will feel this feeling of love to each other. yes, it is not video game, but it plays big role in our life and in some cases it really replaces our alive relationship even if people should live in reality.

no...it was really serious and we have big plans for our future. and i really don't think that it is stupid. there are a lot of people who found each other by network. so if it nothing for you, maybe it depends on person.

so if they find each other and continue communicating that means that networks replaced alive relationship. and we even can manage with finding your second lover without any meetings in real life. we have web camera and we can see and be sure that this person is good and you are satisfied with him.

yes it means that network replace alive relationship, because if there isn't any networks then this person who shy to come will never come and speak. In addition, i want to say about my person story. I have communicated with one boy for half a year and later we understood that we feel some feelings to each other and then we began to be like girlfriend and boyfriend. we were keeping in touch for 4 months and it was great, so i can say that networks have already replaced our alive relationships.

ok i quiet agree with you, but let's talk about people who are very shy and they just can't come to person, whom they like that is why they use network and try to find some ways for communicating with them, because in real life they can't do it, because of fear.

do you want to say that you don't use networks? or you use them just for communicating with known for you people? i am not sure about that, because every person finds some new friends and they can communicate all day, which menas that they don't go outside that leads to living in the social network.

i don't totally agree with you. Yes, maybe it is dangerous for people to lose reality, but in the real life, the majority uses the social networks for communicating. So it is possible that it can replace alive relationship or it has already replaced it. i have heard many stories that people have found each other by network and then they find out that they fall in love.

on the other hand, there are a lot of social networks around us and each of them is really widespread. People use them not only for keeping touch with their's friends and relatives, but also for finding some other friends, even the second lover. That is why i am agree that social network replace alive relationships. Most peope prefer to communicate virtuallly.

but now we are talking about atheist, not people who believe in God.

if atheist don't believe in God then it is certain that they will not believe in any miracles, including ghosts.

i don't totally agree with you. Yes, student's in most cases can't go against teacher. In addition, most students rather pay money then study hardly. Anyway, there is a chance against a form of corruption. Students have rights not to pay money. in order to prove their rights they can record how teacher is asking for money or record a video hoe they are taking money. it is illegal so they can show these records to a judge, but there are little chance to win.

I don't quite agree with you. It even sounds very severely! Just imagine that someone from your family is ill and suffer from a dangerous disease. Will you let him or her dye or you will try to save his/her life? How can you spare money for treatment a disease of the nearest person for you? In addition, I don't think that people will let killing one's relatives, despite of the bad condition of sick person. Moreover, in my point of view, it is not right to put out different organs from human beings. Will you let doctors to cut a person, whom you love very much and put out organs from him or her? There are should be belief, that some sick people will recover, even if it takes a lot of time.

In my point of view it depends on how one uses computer. If s/he uses it just for entertainment like playing games, watching films or chatting and s/he spends all the time on computer, then of course it steals our personal time. If one uses computer with some aims like finding some useful information from the Internet, typing some documents, reading news or just to say “hello” to your mother from Skype if you are abroad then computers make our life easier. In addition, we can earn money using the Internet. Today there are a lot of possibilities not only to find a job from the Internet, but also to buy some clothes, to buy a ticket or to pay some bills. On the other hand, computers are harmful for people’s health. We can damage our eyesight and there is a big radiation from the computer. Anyway, if you will follow some rules such as wearing protecting glasses and not spending a lot of time on computer, then everything will be ok. To sum up, as you can see there are more advantages of using computer, than disadvantages, so I just would like to ask you: Can you imagine life without computer now?