Atheists can't say how male and female evolved at same exact time to reproduce
True
Side Score: 19
|
 |
No
Side Score: 15
|
|
|
|
|
True, they right their own versions of the Bible, among those versions are the NIV, NKJV, NASB, ASB, and hundreds of others....and none of them are God's word but are only perversions of the Bible. Only one book is God's word or they are all books of lies all saying different things. We have God's word in English, it's called the King James Bible. Side: True
1
point
Darwinian Theory explained. Side: True
0
points
You see, the Left does not have to prove anything they use to indoctrinate our children. They have the Teachers union allowing them free reign to simply call evolution a theory while at the same time preaching it as fact. There are thousands of questions unanswered such as where did that first living cell come from. They say it's a theory, while being the only theory allowed in our science classes. These people are arrogant Big Brother Leftists and they will indoctrinate our children in every public school to their secular religion. No other belief system allowed. They say evolution is a theory but teach it as a science...LOL... while all other theories are not allowed. This is why the Left has always refuses to allow school choice. They would lose control of our children's minds if school choice were allowed to parents. No matter how bad our public schools, Democrats refuse to allow school choice. They want your child funneled into the public school system where they can be properly conditioned to the PC way of thinking. Side: True
2
points
They have the Teachers union allowing them free reign to simply call evolution a theory while at the same time preaching it as fact. Do you still not know the definition of the word 'theory' in the context of evolution? As soon as you say this, you lose all your credibility with anyone who's taken an introductory science class. There are mountains of evidence supporting evolution. The fact that we don't know how life begins doesn't mean that we shouldn't teach evolution, it means that we tell students "We don't know how life began." You know, the truth. Side: No
1
point
1
point
1
point
Nancy? Is that you? Uh oh. You let him out. Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary, Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore— While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping As of some one gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door— (Bronto laughs with morbid glee, spreads his wings and flaps his little raven ass out the window) Side: True
1
point
The theory of walking whales... yep heard of it, they crawled into the water after being hooved hyenas and manifested pectoral fins, a giant fluked tail, a blow hole, lost their fur, developed 10 million different inner bodily systems, grew a penis of 50 times the size, lost their 4 legs, and gained 80,000 pounds, and some blubber jumped in there somewhere. Why? Just cause... The end... Side: True
|
Atheism offers no way of explaining anything. It simply means we don't believe in god. If you ask an atheist how male and female came to be from some asexual entity, they have no answer How? I don't know, but perhaps a biologist could offer a better answer than an atheist. If a creature was breeding in mass, being a 2 sex entity would provide no advantage. It would provide a disadvantage. Actually, sexual reproduction offers a huge advantage: genetic variation. It's for the same reason it's a bad idea for siblings to reproduce. First rule of genetics, spread the genes apart. The concept of an asexual creature somehow magically producing male and female, who are different in a million different ways per their reproductive systems, their chromosomes, and their physical traits, is the biggest fairytale myth every told by militant atheists. This isn't something that comes from atheists, it comes from science. It's also much more believable than a god that exists outside of time and space that made everything in an instant with magic. The fact is, they are writing their own version of the Bible as we speak. Side: No
1
point
1
point
It's not harder to believe. If I showed you that this was a computer simulation and that there was a programmer outside of the hard drive of our matrix, you'd happily accept it and skip along. What's hard to believe is that nothing manifested our reality out of its magical nothingness. Try to sell that one even to an Atheist while they aren't in a religious debate forum in "Atheist mode"... You couldn't sell it to them without a heavy bribe. Side: True
If I showed you that this was a computer simulation and that there was a programmer outside of the hard drive of our matrix, you'd happily accept it and skip along. Keyword there: "showed" Actually show some evidence and you might just have something, but you can't. What's hard to believe is that nothing manifested our reality out of its magical nothingness. You're right, that would be hard to believe. Fortunately that's not what scientists or atheists believe. We simply say we don't know what occurred before the big bang. We have not assumed there was nothing - that's the narrative of the religious. Side: No
|
