Banned from debate for making good point
50 Americans killed & STILL Obama & Hillary refuse to say Islamic terrorism! What traitors
|
1
point
Let's see how much you can cuss and whine..........do more of it, you need the practice for eternity in Hell where you are going. You need to be saved from Hell, you can be saved, but you won't, will you? You will just keep on hating God and anybody who tries to tell you that you need to be and can be saved from Hell. Stupid punk. Why do you want to be that way? 1
point
Violent verses in the Quran .... shall we engage in a little Quran study ?? ..... Islam: we will call it what it is .... the SUBJUCATION of ALL to the will of Allah ... whether it be by will of by force ... under the banner od religion < their mask and cover -------------------------------------- Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing .... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. Quran quotes: "Pardon (people) and overlook (their faults). Don't you love that Allah should forgive you." (24:22) "Whatever good they (people of other religions) do, they will not be denied it (by Allah), and Allah knows who the righteous are." (3:115) 1
point
0
points
I don't care about the Quran or muslims. .... maybe you should .... http://www.westernjournalism.com/ 1
point
Im not sure if AintNow and fromwithout are the same person but they are both terrible debaters. Both of them will ban you for simply disagreeing or proving them wrong. Which is a ludicrous practice on a debate site. AintNow is worse, however. He is more harmful to Christianity than fromwithout is. While fromwithout dies a grave disservice to conservatism i think SaintNoClue has done a worse disservice to Christianity.. Both are simply not very likeable people who I think must have very unhappy and small and angry lives to vent do much bigotry and intolerance here on a daily basis.as a Christian I pray for them both. 1
point
I ban people for bad manners, and that usually means I have seen them being profane in my debate or in other debates on the site. Bad manners includes consistently trying to lead the discussion in a direction which refused to listen to my input for the discussion, refuses to acknowledge the things I am saying, just plain rudeness trying to bully the conversation. You have been a foul mouth punk repeatedly, and I'm going to ban you for it. If I create a debate and allow you to post, I will not ban you for disagreeing with me as long as you can show me the respect of responding intelligently to my statements and questions, and not ignoring them and insulting my by going on and on claiming your opinion is all that matters. I'm trying to be nice. I'm not good at being nice with people who act like foul mouth punks and think they can bully me around. Somehow our culture today is teaching people that if they can be the loudest and the rudest, they can force those they disagree with to shut up. I think it's a disgrace to your parents, the way you act with me.......and the same for a lot of other people on here. 2
points
I ban people for bad manners, and that usually means I have seen them being profane in my debate or in other debates on the site. You would have to be delusional to actually believe this about yourself. I answered your question about methods in which DNA gets added to the genome. (You haven't refuted because you can't.) Used your own argument against you And said that evolution is testable/falsifiable and can be used to make predictions which makes it more useful than an imagined god. None of which were profane and all were in direct response to something you said which was quoted in the response. And there are scores of examples of you doing this in nearly every single debate you have - thus the existence of this clone debate. You need to reexamine yourself and try to determine why your perception is so far afield from reality. 1
point
|
