Why don't you stick your fucking Bible for all the good it's done up your gaping everlasting hole, and stop getting involved in debates that you haven't a fucking clue about.

It's obvious that you've no idea about evolution or what the theory shows. First of all it does not state that humans came from monkeys, it states that we evolved from a common ancestor with APES.

Scientists always say there is a missing link they have to find but they cant find it because there isn't! There is no half monkey half human animal.

Scientists do not always say this, please tell me when and where you heard an actual reputable scientist make this claim.

There is many fossils of transitional species, ones that document the gradual evolution from quadrupedal animal to bipedal humans. I'd put up links but this is nothing that wont come straight up when you google it. Try Australopithecus to get you started.

In true science you review data to form an unbiased conclusion and what you are doing with evolution is taking incomplete data (ex. missing link)

"True science" is about building empirical data to prove hypothesis and then to use said theory to investigate phenomena, this is what evolutionary biologists do and let me tell you there is mountains of evidence to prove Evolution as fact, there is none, that is not even one piece of evidence that proves creationist ideas.

The fossil record is never going to be complete, ever, there is too many factors involved in fossilization that fossils are rare and extremely valuable evidence, most animals that ever exist can not hope to be fossilized, but still there are mountains of fossils that catalogue evolution in many species and in all kingdoms.

Molecular evidence alone proves evolution even if not one fossil was ever found.

Now i do believe that animals can adapt to their environment but not to the extent that humans came from monkeys.

Why? Is it so hard to believe that primitive men were more like their closest genetic cousins. You'd believe that two cousins share the same eye color, because it's right in front of your face, you'd probably be open to the idea that it was a gene that coded for that eye color, but as far as men and apes go, that is too difficult a pill to swallow?

Actually there were inbetween forms, such as multimillion year old fossils of creatures that can be called neither monkes nor humans, but something inbetween. As an example: Homo gautengensis, Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis, Homo ergaster, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus. All of these used to live on our planet millions of years ago, and now evovled into us. And admit it, their existance is already proven.

And it is actually your point that has no evidence, like you cant really prove the existence of God, you just have faith(Just FYU, im not atheist). But come on, faith is not enough to be an evidence in such questions. So it actually is the creationism theory the one that lacks evidence.