CreateDebate


Debate Info

9
9
Yes I Agree No we should continue to pay
Debate Score:18
Arguments:22
Total Votes:18
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes I Agree (9)
 
 No we should continue to pay (8)

Debate Creator

Roadrunner17(7) pic



Insurance Is a Gamble

Everyone who drives is required by law to have insurance and provide a proof of it if stopped. Everyday there are accidents out there and this is why I state that insurance is a gamble. We dont know if we will wreck but yet we are required to pay thousands of dollars for insurance. There are various discounts that are offered if a good driver but they are but a bribe to make people continue to partner with them. If in an accident and it wasnt our fault our insurance still raises the rates due to the fact that the car was damage. This is were I believe its unjustice to make people pay so much money and continue to pay such amount even though they are safe drivers. I think insurance companies are corrupt and just want to take our money. Why should we continue to pay so much money? Why should we be the ones to pay for anothers mistake? Why should we continue to have insurance???

Yes I Agree

Side Score: 9
VS.

No we should continue to pay

Side Score: 9
1 point

Its one of Americas greatest scams, people nowdays feel lost without it, but the reality is if they saved the money that they pay to any insurance company they wouldnt need insurance.

Amercican capitalism will aways figure out a way to profit off one another.

The most flawed system to ever exsist in human history is capitalism, and most Americans cant see or imagine any other system, they are brain washed to think any other system can not work, lol what a mind job the capitalist have done, sad really, as people we accept letting another die if they lack the means to produce capital and then we have the nerve to think we are moral humans, good little Christians, I am light years beyond most American thinking and beyond most human comprehension, I know that sounds arrogant buts its true.

Side: Yes I Agree
1 point

What is your alternative to capitalism?

I am light years beyond most American thinking and beyond most human comprehension, I know that sounds arrogant buts its true.

This doesn't sound arrogant, it sounds wrong and stupid.

Side: Yes I Agree
Warjin(1577) Disputed
1 point

What is your alternative to capitalism?

A resource based economy for one, there are other systems all with flaws but far better then capitalism, we Americans know no other way of life, capitalism seems like the only sound choice to most of us, but the reality is capitalism feeds of another suffering and destroys the environment and can greatly hinder human progress if it goes against making a profit (example clean energy), no man should have the right to stake claim on anything they didn't not create, meaning the Earth, the planet is here for us to share in live in harmony with it's residence.

This doesn't sound arrogant, it sounds wrong and stupid.

I'm sure it would to many, for many years I have learned to see beyond the average humans perception of reality and social normality, much like those people 1000 years ago claiming that the earth was not the center of the known universe. I have learned to see things from the outside in, as if I were a extraterrestrial race viewing earth and all the inhabitants along with our social structure from a universal balanced point of view, (hence the reason I use an alien head as my avatar, there is a method to my madness.

I know we can do better but we are blinded by our own greed and social division, bigotry and ignorance to understand this yet.

Side: No we should continue to pay
pakicetus(1455) Disputed
1 point

I am light years beyond most American thinking and beyond most human comprehension, I know that sounds arrogant buts its true.

Doesn't sound arrogant. Someone saying "I'm a pro gamer" is arrogant.

This sounds like something coming from someone with NPD.

Also, that statement is false as hell.

Side: No we should continue to pay
Atrag(5666) Disputed
1 point

Its one of Americas greatest scams, people nowdays feel lost without it, but the reality is if they saved the money that they pay to any insurance company they wouldnt need insurance.

Under your ideas, if my car gets damaged by someone else and I can't get to work to earn money to feed my family etc, and the other driver can't afford to pay - what happens? I'm just screwed? Or is it your idea that the state mandates people to save in order to afford this?

Side: No we should continue to pay
1 point

Why of course it is...on both sides the insurer and the insured. The insured gambles that they may have something happen where they will need insurance while the insurer gambles that the event won't occur. That is also the reason why flood insurance and earthquake insurance cost more and are separated from any standard homeowners policy...the insurers don't like writing that kind of paper!

Side: Yes I Agree

Insurance is a gamble but people cannot cope today without it.

Side: Yes I Agree
2 points

Insurance is a gamble, and in many instances one I would contend we ought not be compelled to play.

However, in the case of automobile insurance the moderator/OP misrepresents the actual practice. We should not be required to insure our own vehicles, but we should be required to hold insurance that would pay for damages we cause to others property or selves as a consequence of our recklessness. This holds us to greater account, and makes it more probable that those who are immediate victims of the recklessness of others are not further harmed by financial hardship.

Side: No we should continue to pay
1 point

Actually, in professionalism it may be a gambling but.

By doing so we provide safety to our family and others too for their good future and that is for what human is known, yes it is humanity.

weather the mistake(in accident) is our or someone else but the loss is done.

And now we have to recover it for ourselves or helping other as per humanity

In all way it is good.

thanks for your time consideration and patience listening.

Side: No we should continue to pay
Roadrunner17(7) Disputed
1 point

I understand that accidents happen but the person involved in the accident that was doing the correct thing in the first place should not be held responsible. Every day there are accidents so what makes you safe from the rest of the drivers out there? This is why I support the fact that insurance is a gamble and one could save so much money by not paying for insurance. I feel that if the other person is responsible for the damages they should be held responsible for the damage and if they cannot pay they can be required to go to a payment plan of some sort or take out a loan. With all the money saved from not paying on insurance one could have the extra money to fix their vehicle if such disaster happened.

Side: Yes I Agree
1 point

The odds of living a life where you never need insurance are so incredibly small. You will need insurance at some point and that is a fact.

Side: No we should continue to pay