CreateDebate


Aigerka's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Aigerka's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Namely this is what i am going to do... More preciesly, i wish to be a politican... However, i am too weak and naive =) So, i hope that time will change my character, but not my intentions.

Aigerka(90) Clarified
3 points

hmmm...difficult question))) I think that one husband is quite enough)) Quality is more important than quantity)

1 point

No =) thanks, i'll refrain from this temptation =) Thank you for participation and good luck))

1 point

Thanks for your proposal =) but let's agree to differ...

2 points

I see the point of one man having several wifes... The number of men is lower than number of women. And it will help to increase the populaion of the world... Talking about 2 others... Are u kidding?!? O_o it is not marriage but perrersion of the family institute.

1 point

Yeah, that's a good idea! Another way to spend money for NOTHING, to DESTROY our planet, And by this only create new technologies, which, actually, can be created even without these stupid sacrifices!

1 point

I am sorry...Do you mean that drinking dirty water, breathing dirty air, living in the radioactive planet is LIFE? It is not living but stupid existance!

1 point

But is't exist! that is the point. Even with small steps you can reach the place you want to. Here is the same! Step by step

Aigerka(90) Clarified
1 point

What? can you make your question clear for me to answer? trillions of money is spent for NOTHING, instead of being spent for planting trees, cleaning water and air!

2 points

I agree that there is a cruelty. however, you can not claim that all of the people do not deserve to live. Even if "the life is not precious", we had a chance to live here and should safe planet for future generations

1 point

The total federal spending budget only in 2005 was on the order of $2 trillion ($2000 billion)

1 point

I just advise to spend these billions to save our world! Yeah, i am supporting an idea to save what we have, instead of searching from smth existance of what is not proven! I agree that it is kind of a fear. Moreover, as i already said, there is a risk to stay with nothing but poisoned planet. What do you prefer:knowing that there is an interesting planet with water somewhere away thousands of light years or just leaving in rest and peace?

1 point

I can "copy-paste" too, my dear. There are discoveries, but they can not make your life better! And by making these discoveries we destory OUR WORLD!!!

1 point

Well i do not think so. I provide well-known fact. I am not saying that the only reason of formation of ozon wholes. It is one of the reasons.

1 point

Well, i can not deny that deleloping space technology positievely affects on developing other spheres. I do not claim that we should stop delevoping technologies. We should stop destroying our planet by sending rockets into scape for NOTHING!!!

1 point

This radioactive trash lays on the Comdrome and poisons our water, ground and air!

1 point

One of the primary concerns is the pollution caused by the disposal of rocket parts in space. This is due to the fact that some of the fuel tanks and boosters become dead weight when the rocket exits the atmosphere. This makes it more effective to get rid of these parts. Some other "space debris" are old satellites, broken and lost equipment, and boosters from rocket launchers. Recent developments in "green" technology have decreased the effects of this problem.

Some of the other problems are the cost and the safety hazard it presents to the people on some of these missions. The space program was a very costly program, and the recent economic downturns have lead to thought and action towards privatizing the space program. The only oversight that these people have is that making the space program smaller will remove jobs and lead to more unemployment. As you can see, the decisions made to change anything with this program should not be made lightly or without deep thought. As for safety issues, only 18 deaths have resulted as a cause of manned spaceflight. As with everything, experience is the best tool.

1 point

And what if NOT??!?? Think soberly! People are suffering from this exploration. As a person, who lives near by Baykonur, i can claim that space exploration brings nothing but radiation, radioactive trash, increased number of illnesses and so on.

2 points

What about cosmic trash and ozon wholes? The consiquences of space exploration are horrible! We spend billions in order to destroy own world!

1 point

I can not argue that "it is better to see once rather than hear hundred times" but what is the conclusion of it? If child will put his hands into fire he will have burns as he was told. But is not it silly to take a risk with the price of own limbs? There are a lot of proverbs such as: fool learns from own mistakes, and smart on someone's...

Of course with the help of practice you can be confident in some points but what if the end does not justify the means?

1 point

But nurturing is also theory about what is good and what is bad. Isn't it?!

1 point

I am in the same position on this issue) there is no knowledge without theory and now confidence in these knowledge without practice. But the foundation is Theory

1 point

I believe that they should!

1. Imagine how many people died since the Paleolithic period when the first human saw the light. Most of them were buried. The whole planet is a big grave. U say that it is not fair towards dead people to cremate them. Now try to think, is it fair toward dead people to walk on their graves?!?! Of course it is NOT!

2. Are u familiar with the words: exhumation, hooliganism bank of donor organs and necrophilia?!? is it right to interrupt the peace of the dead?!? NO!!! People are exhuming bodies for several reasons: to sell organs on the black market, to outrage dead and so on. Do you want such kind of a disrespecting towards your relatives...Of course u do not....

Instead of thinking over someone's rules, think over your moral principles...

1 point

I actually agree with previous speaker. It causes phycological problems. The differences in mentality, culture and way of thinking make barrier between parents. As a result bad relations, alienation and even contempt. Even if u adopt him when he is 1 or 2 years old. I believe that our nationality and culture not in our upbringing but in our blood


1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]