CreateDebate


DaWolfman's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of DaWolfman's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

You are telling me that you can run a mile in under 6 minutes and do a 10 mile hike with 60 pounds on your back, but are physically unable to do 50 pushups?

1 point

I think you will find, that whilst the fitness requirement for women is considerably lower, many women, myself included, would have passed even if we had been men.

What in the hell are you talking about?

Even if you had been a man you would have passed?

I'm sorry but I don't understand where you are going with this.

1 point

but how many people would pass those courses if they do not have the hands on experience

Every person within the virtual medical field must still physically pass all tests required of their field of interest, as in an EMT would have to do all necessary physical tasks before being certified.

1 point

Why was this a dispute?

even if they are fairly rare.

Which is why I said offering the job to all female applicants would be ludicrous when a waiver can be released to any female who meets the necessary requirements of a combat specialized soldier. To hold a whole 8 weeks of training for only a slight minority ending up graduating would be a useless waste of government spending. Whilst the elite women can merely get a waiver which allows them to fall into rank next to any man.

3 points

hahaha is this an air force DEP talking shit?

No, I'm not.

Marines have the toughest graduation requirements son... so wake up.

I never said they didn't, though Navy Seals hold onto that title. For regular enlistment sure Marines do have the toughest BMT.

No it wouldn't the Marines are the best as far as being physical goes.

Humans differentiate from eachother. Though the different branches teach us that teamwork is essential, it does not change that one person is different from another. You say your average Marine can do 60 push ups a minute, I am sure we can both find people who can surpass that limit with ease.

As far as I'm concerned mate, we as members of the military are swearing to protect our country. Arguing over whose branch is better isn't worth it.

Every man that is in the military had to pass basic military training, and that in itself shows a mans worth.

1 point

That is an excellent and valid point.

What I was trying to convey is something such as a morbidly obese man might have a picture of when he was in the prime shape of his life, or possibly someone having a profile picture that isn't even them. That is what I meant by false representation, not when a person puts off a front that they are somebody whom they are not. Though the way I worded my statement made such a conclusion indefinitely logical =\

1 point

female bodybuilding has a healthy following

Did you mention this due to me mentioning it earlier?

These women are undoubtedly as strong, or stronger, than the average soldier.

That is a bold statement, one which you are obviously not giving the average combat specialized soldier very much credit.

Your average combat infantry Marine is trained to hold the physical capability of running a mile in a half within 9 minutes, and run a solid 40 minutes straight.

I feel that your average female body builder would have trouble accomplishing such a task.

There are many different physical requirements of an infantry trained soldier, ones that I feel a female would not have the capability of accomplishing. The extremely limited few who do hold those capabilities can get a waiver, however the majority of women joining the military should not get to apply for such a job. It should be a request that is judged on a physical capability basis.

It seems like most of the women interested in such roles would be fairly likely to be physically qualified for it.

If you look at the requirements upon graduating between a male and female recruit you ought to note a noticeable difference. They are not as physically qualified as a male is, regardless of equality: a female trainee upon graduating did not have to meet the same physical requirements as a male trainee.

The military is an amazing opportunity for men and women alike, however I adamantly feel that some jobs should be reserved for men, unless a woman falls into the category of an overly physically qualified female.

There is absolutely no sexism present within my argument, any that is perceivable was either a mistake on my part or was a comment which was inevitable.

3 points

No I am not in the Army, I am in the United States Air Force E-3 currently in the DEP.

The Marines have the toughest boot camp out of any of the other branches.

That doesn't make the Marines the best branch, not even the best at push ups.

The Marines are the strongest both mentally and physically.

That is a biased misconception. I could say the same for my branch or any other branch, and it would still hold the same level of credibility.

1 point

do you think kids under the age of 18 should do drugs

A more specific question would be much appreciated.

I will assume that you are asking about drugs such as Marijuana, X, Zanex, basic hallucinogens, stimulants, and depressants AKA drugs that get you high in some sense.

No kids under the age of 18 should not do drugs, it is bad for the developing mind. Once they are in their mid twenties I could care less, however before their mind has fully developed messing around with different drugs can be detrimental to one's development as well as being possibly fatal.

4 points

best

No, the Marines are not the best branch of the military.

1 point

13 year old america female

In all honesty ( and I am being totally truthful ) most of the ideas discussed on this website are over your head. I would suggest sticking to debates where you can post something valid on, I would also suggest re-reading your posts as when you write as sloppy as you do people tend to decide you have no valid point to make.

This will be my last post on this subject, as we are off the debate topic.

2 points

Had the intention that was perceived by you was to promote creationism I would have most likely clicked "dispute" opposed to "support".

I meant that ignorance is bliss in the sense that those whom are consumed by the ideals of creationism find themselves ignorant of the livelihood of those around them who happen to not follow or denunciate their personal path. It is these people who violate the basic human rights of others whom find themselves in not only feeling a sense of accomplishment after a good picketing, but find that they themselves have done something for the betterment of mankind. Which is where I believe the phrase "ignorance is bliss" applies to such people.


8 of 189 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]