You must love being banned. I can't think of another reason you're such an obnoxious troll.

Hey, dipshitzky. I banned you because you are an obnoxious troll. That's the only reason I banned you. Get used to it, or learn to be civil. Your choice.

I can't believe someone actually down voted this. Lololol

In my profile I can manage my block list. I have four people on there, but I can't remember how I blocked them.

Why do idiots like yourself keep bringing up the old testament? The example you gave was Jewish law, which applied only to Jews. It has nothing to do with Christianity. Like I just said. You know nothing. You are a fool. Sucks to be you.

Oh. The crusades were a response to Muslim agression. They are the only reason Muslims don't rule the world.

And your knowledge of history is laughable. For one thing, many of the victims, if not the majority, of the inquisition were Christians.they were persecuted because they simply wanted to worship God in a way that was different than what the church wanted. Btw, the Catholic church is not Christian. It was created by a Pagan emperor hundreds of years after the time of Christ.

Also, the witch hunts were, most likely, the result of a biological agent that afflicted their crops. It affected their minds and caused a kind of phychosis. The History Channel did a show about it. Long story short. You know nothing.

Not to mention Roe vs Wade. That one was pure politics............

Show me a period in history when Christians were not persecuted. You can't.

Show me where the Bible tells Christians to do that! Of course, you can't. You're just an atheist troll. And a piss poor one at that.

For two thousand years, atheists have been trying to eliminate Christianity. They have failed. So now they think the muzzies will help them. Good luck with that. Historically, Christianity has always flourished when perscuted. So go right ahead and persecute us. You're only shooting yourself in the foot. Lolol.

Oh no! He insulted you, Bront. Whatever will you do? Lol! What a wanker. He confuses debate with insults. How childish.

This is just one of many reasons why Muslims should be banned from our country. Their 'religion' is incompatible with the values we live by. They don't belong here. Period.

Hey ghost. Is this your idea of political debate? If so, you might want to consider another hobby. Something you could be good at. Like watching grass grow. Actually, you probably do not have the attention span for that. How about watching paint dry? Well, even fast-drying paint might be too much of a challenge for you. Don't worry. I'll think of something.

John Wayne Gacy was a democrat. What's your point? If it is your desire to implicate political beliefs in criminal activity, you'll have to do better than this. Especially since most assassinations, attempted assassinations and mass shootings are committed by democrats.

They spread the good news of a risen Savior, while facing the threat of imprisonment and death. That's how.

Show me His body. The Roman Empire did its best to stop the spread of Christianity. In fact, the more Christianity is persecuted, the the more it spreads. How did Christianity spread throughout the known world against the best efforts of the most powerful empire in the worlds best efforts to stop it? All they had to do was show His dead corpse.

It is a historical fact that Mohammed was a murderer and a pedophile who instructed his followers to lie in order to promote the spread Islam. These are hardly credible witnesss. Also, such an event would have been witnessed by the entire world. Notice that no one else recorded such an event. Your evidence is quite laughable. Try again?

The twelve apostles, for one. They were not fictional characters. They were real people who witnessed it all and wrote it all down.

I've already answered this. They claimed that Jesus was the Son of God and that He rose from the dead. They also suffered torture and death rather than deny a risen Christ. Once again, no one would die for a lie.

Did anyone else witness Mohammed splitting the moon in two?

So, are you saying that it's idiotic to believe what a historical document says?

A belief in God is based on faith. But that faith is based on evidence. Some of that evidence is from eyewitness accounts. They were present when Jesus performed His miracles. They witnessed His death and resurrection. They suffered inprisonment, torture and death because they stood by their eyewitness accounts. No one would die for something they knew to be a lie. Therefore, they told the truth. Now. Do you have any evidence to contradict this historical account?

You would have to agree that the same thing is true about a naturalistic origin of the universe. There is no evidence that it happened that way, or is even possible. There is also no way to prove that there isn't a God. So where does that leave us? It means that both positions are a matter of faith. Which is what I've been saying all along, and atheists flatly refuse to admit.

Even if that's true, what about the physical constants? They are immaterial, yet they affect the material universe. Without them, the universe could not exist. They are not composed of matter or energy. Why do they exist? Quantum physics cannot explain them. Nothing can... with one exception.

Look at the debate score. Just look at all the idiots who believe that the universe created itself! If it wasn't so sad, it would be hilarious.

A scientific answer, maybe. Events cannot occur without time and space for them to occur in. However, such constraints are eliminated when an all powerful God is involved. Since it is physically impossible, that leaves only a supernatural explanation.