CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Hostiles
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


RSS Grugore

Reward Points:703
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
77%
Arguments:750
Debates:23
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
-1 points

Democrats obviously have no problem with it, since they didn't cough up the money for the wall in the first place. It's not Trump's fault for trying to find the money elsewhere. The blame lies squarely on the democrats.

1 point

Which is exactly what they have done with global warming. Hung up their lab coats.

1 point

Lol! NASA was caught, red-handed, falsifying temperature data to support global warming. So, who is the real fool?

1 point

The majority of scientists once believed the world was flat.

1 point

Sorry, but suspended animation is science fiction. No such thing.

1 point

I don't see how it would change anything. You cant get around the light speed limit. So we would not be able to interact in any meaningful way.

1 point

It's official then. You're a blithering idiot. How could anyone be dumb enough to allow their enemy to get the first shot?

1 point

You would rather allow the other guy to strike first? Is that what you're saying?

1 point

For what? Wishing that someone would die? Nothing wrong with that.

1 point

I never mentioned killing her. I merely stated that she needs to die.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Unresolved
Winning Position: The most pathetic thing I've seen on here.
Winning Position: Yes
Winning Position: Well, DUH. It's obvious.
Winning Position: The story of Mohammed: Islam unveiled.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here