I have to ask which "dad" are you talking about? Because as far as I'm concerned we already had thousand of Religions in the history of Mankind. If that's your logic, then it means that modern religions also rebelled against the original dads because the first Dads are the ones who developed the real concept of God.

Yup, that is super natural in it's context. That we came from nothingness, like I said Atheism is open to ideas super natural or not the only difference is that we require evidence or proof. If creating fire from nothing is possible then sure why not but make sure you provide evidence or do it yourself before I believe that you can create fire. That's the concept which most atheists are basing on. We do not entirely reject the idea of the existence of God or super natural occurrences as long as it provides sufficient evidence if you could provide evidence of God rather than the Bible then sure I'll believe in God although the possibility of God is not impossible we have to determine first which God from the 1000 Gods is the right one since all Gods mainly rely on Faith alone.

I think you are misunderstanding the concept of Atheism. Atheism has no specific organization, we are not bound into doctrines. Which means all of us are responsible for our own actions, and we do not reflect the community of Atheists because of our individual actions as well. Our difference is that you are guided by leaders such as priests, popes, and your Bible you are expected to manifest the teachings of your Holy Book or your God and some of these leads into violence because you are being leaded by an evil person aka proxies of God.

I also believe that we have organizations or charities built by an Atheist. I do not however believe that particular atheist reflects every Atheists in the world which your questions suggests that why are there no charity sponsored atheist movements or what so ever.

Atheism is the disbelief of an existence of a deity. Most atheist relies on the concept of Science and not the idea of hearsay and super natural occurrences that has no evident proof what so ever. The thing is, an atheist is open to possibilities. Magical or not, as long as it provides sufficient proof or records then we could close into that idea of magic however as far as I'm concerned there are no evident proofs to prove any super natural occurrences that are within the realm of spirituality. What I mean by these are events such as: the division of the Red Sea, The Great Flood, Ghosts, Myths, and etc. All the evidences that are provided within this realm are only private experiences none are which sufficient enough to prove a fact.