This is Impossible. I am going to research this more, BUT they are not Christian when they believe in a fairy tale story about Christ, not what the Scripture says about the Son of God.

This is not evolutions..thats called extinction. One species died, correct? Peppered Moths dead and melanic moth lived???? That sounds like extinction, or strongest survive. The pepper is gone...it did not evolve.

Show me the document, approved by more than 5 scientific boards that there is proof. I'm sorry Wikipedia is NOT a source to be referenced. Only by amateurs is Wiki ever used as a source for information. Please allow this to be an intelligent conversation and lay the facts on the table.

1. It takes several Boards of Science at Worldwide universities to agree of any new' facts' This has not been done with this so called Theory of Evolution.

2. Darwin says "'To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.'

--later he writes and is unsure of 'absurdity' and claims evolutionism as his primary origin of life theory. Though if he understood the Human Eye in detail (Google : darwin eye) then he would be convinced that evolution is not possible.

If those choose to believe we stem from primates and Spineless bacterium thats alright. I just cannot see that as being nearly a fact. It is simply fear mongering from the early 1920's where scientist strongly opposing Christian beliefs took into their own hands the idea of a big bang 'creation' of the Universe. Thats all, they had to have something to believe in to further justify their existence, so they "discovered" it through creativity and assumptions, not fact.

I wonder how excited they were when someone suggested 'We come from apes, who came from Birds, Who came from Lizards, who came from fish, who came from plants and bacteria growing on a rock" OK. Thanks.

Too much information does promote promiscuity and common sense details the results of that. Not only physicly, but emotionally on the youth today. I heard someone say that Teenage Oral sex was becoming very popular in after school programs. That is a horrible sign that youth (12-18) yr olds are performing things they see on the Internet...otherwise why would they put their MOUTH down there??? When i was 13 I thought that was disgusting!

Protection is very important to be taught in school, but abstinence should be the focus. Relying on a condom ad education gives kids the authority to have sex freely, and we all know the stats are not perfect. We need to be centered on saving sex to Marriage and build the belief into kids that sex is best to wait, and can be very damaging otherwise.

This is a great topic, one that myself as 100% on, based on how society treats these issues in public, media, etc. Kids know about sex...so we need a strong appeal towards prevention of them becoming active.

It is very simple, Please, both sides read this article.

http://www.narth.com/docs/animalmyth.html

Why are you gay? Because of genes? Tell us about your childhood? What did your family unit look like?

Really...you are certainly confused. I could not beleive this came from SZ after reading your other ignorant posts.

Read the sentence after (attachment theory) where you argue that these 'developments occur within framework of genetic levels.......yet the rest of your message agrees with social learning impacting future relationships? I quote you "we're born with potential and the environment, and probably chance...help determine what gets filled in and emphasized! Whoa! Thats true!

Thanks for the supporting evidence of Homosexuality (future relationships based on social learning at a young age) being credited to ENVIRONMENTAL factors :)

Oh, the color-blindness is not even in the same category.

It is basically Murder. You must give a life a chance? What if your mother had you aborted?

Do I have to type an argument..cannot I simply choose a side? There is no question that even in Ron L was alive he would laugh at the ridiculousness of this 'system'