CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
While I may be a bit biased on the subject, I will have to lean towards the "Yes" side. As Nummi has often ignored my arguments in the past purely because of my religious beliefs.
I didn't ignore a single argument of yours... but you did ignore most of mine. Oh, I did ignore some of yours, but only because you ignored mine first. Your arguments were simply idiotic, even based on delusions. You think I'm supposed to agree with nonsense? No.
I do not care whether you are religious or not. If your arguments do not make sense, not just make sense but are such idiotic nonsense that they deserve nothing more than ridicule then that's exactly what they will get in response. But still, first I tried explaining what was wrong with your arguments, then eventually I ended up repeating the same over and over while you simply ignored everything I said...
I'd say look at yourself first but I doubt you could do it with an objective mind.
Nummi does tend to bash religious ideals and people just for the fun of it. I've encountered several people like that on this site and nummi does it to an extent and way that makes him/her/shim/ (whatever the fuck you are) seem more like a jack ass just trying to offend those whom believe in anything.
Nummi does tend to bash religious ideals and people just for the fun of it.
Oh really? And if you didn't have such idiotic beliefs and if you wouldn't give such nonsensical arguments?
I view you as someone with mental problems, that's all.
I've encountered several people like that on this site and nummi does it to an extent and way that makes him/her/shim/ (whatever the fuck you are) seem more like a jack ass just trying to offend those whom believe in anything.
Have you ever wondered that maybe the reason it is so is because of you, because of the arguments you give? Ever thought of that?
I never say negative words or anything similar to insult people (unless they are really asking for it), I only say them if it really is so (based on their arguments). Now, what you did here is completely disrespectful and very childish, you truly are an idiot (or would you prefer some other words that apply anyway?).
You are mentally so messed up... I mean, come on, you take fantasy as reality...
As I said, the words I've used to describe you and many others is because of the arguments you and others have given, because those arguments can only be such as they are if you are indeed mentally a mess. Or were you simply trolling? I doubt you were.
I'm not arrogant. There's a difference between being arrogant and knowing oneself.
To be honest I find nummi's style of debating to be quite distasteful, disrespectful at times which doesn't help his case. I will admit I have had issues being civil myself.
Depends on the argument I'm disputing, and who the person is I'm disputing, and what the opponent's tone is. If the person is someone I'm familiar with from previous messes then... it won't be nice.
I have only encountered him a few times, but based on those and times I see him debating with other users I have noticed that he will stubbornly argue his opinion, disregarding any facts the other person may give and also tries to force his opinion on them. Not sure if "ignorant" is 100% correct, but he's at least stubborn.
When it comes to history I only need the basics, that I have, more or less.
My logic is far more advanced than yours.
Alternative views? You obviously haven't really read anything I've said, or you have a very bad memory, or you interpret things the way you want to and not how they are.
When it comes to alternative views, why should I settle for something not as good? I go straight for the best one.
Logic is not something one can actually be ignorant of, it's not knowledge, it's more like a mental ability. Yours is weak.
Alternative views... also doesn't have much to do with knowledge, unless of course we talk about you 'cause you've demonstrated well enough that you cannot make logical conclusions on your own, that you have to read it from somewhere first. And then you also receive a strong bias, as is very obvious.
Alternative views is more about coming to them while debating, not already knowing them (that's how it is with me at least). Anyway, as I already said, why should I settle for something not as good?
How exactly is asking others relevant? How is it relevant what others think of me? I personally know myself, I certainly do not need to know what others think of me. I know that people differ.
I honestly don't get why you even made this pointless debate in the first place. All it shows is your personal immaturity and stupidity.
Have you ever wondered why I haven't made any debates about you? I know you're a stupid prick... I don't need to ask others if you really are, or just ask others what they think. I can see on my own what you are like.
How exactly is asking others relevant? How is it relevant what others think of me? I personally know myself, I certainly do not need to know what others think of me. I know that people differ.
One generally does not see his or herself the same way other does.
honestly don't get why you even made this pointless debate in the first place. All it shows is your personal immaturity and stupidity.
I asked for other perspectives, that is not childish or stupid.
Have you ever wondered why I haven't made any debates about you? I know you're a stupid prick... I don't need to ask others if you really are, or just ask others what they think. I can see on my own what you are like.
You're a biased myopic moron.
You're just a broken record that spits out insults and self praising statements. Grow up.
One generally does not see his or herself the same way other does.
That's right, generally.
I asked for other perspectives, that is not childish or stupid.
This is a personal attempted attack against me.
Considering the fact that you made this debate about me because I pissed you off and you are incapable of handling negative emotions, yes it is childish.
Anyway, in real life, if people gathered around you, literally around you, and began examining you and discussing you, whether you are a biased moron or not, would that be respectful toward you? It would not.
You are a moron, aside other things.
You're just a broken record that spits out insults and self praising statements. Grow up.
Still ignoring what I've been saying... I know myself, I'm not self-praising, I'm simply saying what I am like, when compared to most of humanity.
I'm not spitting out insults, I simply concluded from your "arguments". And there are some good adjectives to describe you.
That you even created this "debate" shows vividly that you have lots of growing to do.
Considering the fact that you made this debate about me because I pissed you off and you are incapable of handling negative emotions, yes it is childish.
Yes, I am obviously completely incapable of handling negative emotions because I made a debate about you.
Anyway, in real life, if people gathered around you, literally around you, and began examining you and discussing you, whether you are a biased moron or not, would that be respectful toward you? It would not.
You are a moron, aside other things.
No one is examining you. Most people here already knew you and are just giving an opinion.
I'm not spitting out insults, I simply concluded from your "arguments". And there are some good adjectives to describe you.
Because its "thinking objectively" right? Basing an argument on "boo hoo, you don't agree with me so you're dumb" seriously, what are you, five?
That you even created this "debate" shows vividly that you have lots of growing to do.
Your inability to deal with reality shows you have alots of growing to do.
I wouldn't call him ignorant what he says are his opinions and no more he's not ignorant to the side he's fighting against because I remember having a religious debate with him and he proved to know a lot about it. So no I don't think he's ignorant.
I say no because I see this as another form of debating. You have aggressive debators, relaxed debators, happy debators, etc. He just uses one of the more rare forms so I'd say he is just being himself and answering honestly......hopefully. :) I do understand where the "Yes" side is coming from though.
Ok, ok now. Are we in kindergarten you guys? No. We shouldn't be making a so-called 'debate' about the potential ignorance of another member. Does it matter? You can have your opinion. There is no need to gather everyone else's opinion on something like this.
