CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:2
Arguments:2
Total Votes:2
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Progressives care more for a women's choice while Pro lifers care more for a human life. (2)

Debate Creator

FromWithin(8241) pic



Progressives care more for a women's choice while Pro lifers care more for a human life.

So tell me which person has true compassion and tolerance? Before responding, DO NOT bring up life of mother or extreme case abortions because these extreme case abortions are not disputed by the GOP. Keep the conversation to what you choicer's support, which is all abortions for any reason.

So here are the priorities of choicer's... convenience, financial situation, control.

The priorities of pro lifers... the right of life for all innocent human lives regardless their financial situation or inconvenience.

So when did the Progressive Left and Democrat Party decide that the value of an innocent human life is conditional? Oh, I forget, it happened when the life of an unborn Baby became political and helped corrupt politicians getting elected.

Abortion flies in the face of every Liberal Progressive who claim to believe in tolerance, inclusivity, open mindedness, diversity of Special Need's babies, etc.

Your's is the side of self love, intolerance, antipathy for the diversity of Special Need's babies, etc.
When voting for Democrat politicians who support No Restriction abortions, you are saying that viable unborn lives means nothing to you. That makes you total phonies when it comes to true compassion for the least of us.

The vast majority of Pro Choice people refuse to compromise and limit abortions to extreme cases only, yet these cases are all they rant about to hide their true inhumanity. Phonies and hypocrites!
Add New Argument
FromWithin(8241)
1 point

Now we will hear the same old rhetoric of how women should have control over their own body.

Yes I agree, and the other life inside of the mother should also have control over their body. Their life is also deserving of protection unless the mother's life is in danger.

Support Dispute Clarify
FromWithin(8241)
1 point

Now as always we will hear bigoted choicer's talking about verses in the Bible symbolically speaking to killing their brutal enemies in war, even their children.

So here is the ludicrous excuses of those who support killing even viable babies, FOR ANY REASON, and then comparing that to children dying in war.

Do you understand the meaning of hypocrite? For any person to support killing innocent viable babies, FOR ANY REASON, and then judging verses in the Bible symbolically speaking to killing the children of those who killed their own children, is beyond being a total hypocrite and far worse then anything that could ever happen in war.

We are talking about killing innocent babies for mere convenience, not in revenge against brutal enemies.

I would also speak out against killing children in war, but have no clue how I would feel if brutal enemies killed my children.

Support Dispute Clarify

Browse More Debates