WHo is the best- Gandhiji vs Hitler
Hitler
Side Score: 9
|
 |
Gandhi
Side Score: 10
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, friend, Actually, when British was in India, the people's position was not as bad as that of German. after all, Gandhi did not improve India in economy. But Hitler was the one who did this great thing. by the end of the second world war also, German had enough money to eat for 2 generations! Side: Hitler
hitler was the one determined man who improved war losen germany condition........weimar republic,socialist,democratics,could none prove relaxing..........definetely hitler kileed at that time but still he was a past but gandhijis division of india is still causing many poor one 22 die...... Side: Hitler
|
2
points
Non-violence(Satyagraha) definitely does not mean making peace but it means fighting bravely and sincerely for truth and doing what is just. Every fight comes with a sacrifice and loss but a satyagrahi (soldier of civil disobedience) must always go on. This is what India believes in. Thanks to Gandhi, India is known as the country having the world's largest democracy. Beat it but Gandhi brought India freedom from the British with just non-violence. "The Holocaust" brought bloodshed to the world and the title of a 'supervillan' to Hitler whereas following the path of non-violence made Gandhi the "Mahatma"(Great person) and brought India its freedom and the world a new outlook altogether. The doctrine of Satyagraha works on the principle that you make the so called enemy see and realize the injustice he is engaged in. It can work only when you believe in God and the goodness of the people to see that they are wrong. Yes, a true Indian still believes in the same principles and follows the same. Now before we take this debate forward, ask yourself whom would you like to be reborn? Gandhi or Hitler? The answer shall prevail. Side: Gandhi
I understand, But his emphasis is no longer implemented in its own origin! Any mass moment starts as a normal NON VIOLENT procession, but it eventually, turns to be a violent one. Gandhi's advent couldn't be followed by indians. But Germany has followed its leade and is economical leader in many aspects Side: Hitler
Don't just judge a leader in his best, but consider his entire contribution to society. Hitler actually brought Germany to its knees in the end, a completely ruined society that was split in 2 for decades. A people once proud was shamed and defenseless at the end of WW2. Anything good that Germany achieves after WW2 is not the work of the dead madman. Ghandi on the other hand? I don't know much about him, but India certainly wasn't ruined by him. Side: Gandhi
1
point
1
point
1
point
|
