Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 8 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 90% |
Arguments: | 8 |
Debates: | 0 |
As for me, paperbacks 100 times better. when i read book on computer or ipad i look aside whether something new happened in my facebook or some other social networks. also as everybody knows it damage eyes. also the process of flipping pages is amazing, when you read page by page and understand that the end of the book is coming and want more and more. maybe e-books have some benefits but i will always choose paperbacks than e-books
i believe that prisoners shouldn't be used in scientific experiments. they are also human beings. so can we think that people who do experiments also make crime? they also injure people and maybe they can kill prisoners after making some experiments. i think, if person made such inexcusable thing he should be executed, otherwise nobody deserve such sufferings.
In my point of view, social networking have many positive sides, rather than negative. Negative sides: it takes too much time and it is harmful for eyes. But benefits of social network privilege. For example to keep in touch with friends from other countries. Other benefit that everybody use social network. Even in job you need to have email address. So i take the view, that social network is helpful if you use it once a day for 1-2 hours. however, sitting in front of monitor whole day can damage health.
I take the view, that gifted students should study together with non-gifted students. First of all, unequlity still exists between gender, between black and white and so on. But unequlity between students is too much. Non-gifted students will think that they are in low level and can not reach big aims. Even if they have some hidden talents they will suppress it. Secondly, many scientists made many experiences on increasing academic achievement. Most of experiences showed that teachers strongly influence on children's achievement. From the other hand we can imagine that gifted and non-gifted children study separately, but it would be good only for gifted children. But will decrease academic achievement of non-gifted children.
In my view, they should be killed. Who knowes will he kept in jail for life or not. If he have good behavior he can be free. Other argument, people have to take responsibility on thier actions. Why innocent people suffer from such pedifiles and serial repists and they just are kept in prison and continue living thier life. It is injustice for simple human beings.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |