Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 3 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 3 |
Debates: | 0 |
I agree with your point on countries that are less developed such as Kenya needing foreign intervention in order to boost their economy. However, for the case on Singapore, I feel that you should take into account the dissatisfaction felt by Singaporeans due to several measures left behind by the British. The racial discord in the early 1960s were attributed to the British biasedness towards certain racial groups during their reign.
Chan claims that technological progress and changes in management in workplaces have allowed gender revolution. I agree heartily to this point. Changes in management, especially with regards to laws protecting the rights of women in workplaces have allowed women to feel safe and perform to their best ability at work. In Singapore, laws have been laid and rallies held advocating the equality of both gender in workplaces. Discrimination is frowned upon and women are encouraged to participate in the shrinking workforce. Furthermore, technological progress have reduced back breaking labour to simple operation of machineries. This encourages the participation of women in the workforce as women are no longer discriminated due to their inability to carry out chores that are deemed too difficult for their physical attributes. As such, I agree with Chan's claims that technological progress as well as changes in management have enabled the gender revolution.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |