HERE I WILL COUNTER SOME FAKE EVIDENCES THAT THE MOON LANDING WAS A HOAX. THERE ARE SEVERAL EVIDENCES TO SUPPORT THE MOON LANDING:

1. THE LIGHTING WAS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO CREATE ARTIFICIALLY IN 1969. THE ONLY LIGHT SOURCE TO CREATE THIS WAS LASERS AT THAT TIME. FIRST THEY WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A HUGE WALL OF LASERS BECAUSE IF THE SHADOWS IN THE PICTURE ARE DIAGONAL, WHICH IS NOT POSSIBLE IF THERE IS A SMALL LIGHTING. THEY WOULD DIVERGE. IN 1969 LASERS WHERE VERY COSTLY, GETTING A WHOLE WALL OF THEM WOULD COST MORE THAN EVEN THE BUDGET OF THE WHOLE COMPANY. ANOTHER REASON WAS DUE TO THE LASERS AT THAT TIME, THE ONLY COLOURED LASERS WHICH WERE AVAILABLE WERE RED. THE COLOURED PHOTOGRAPHS WOULD HAVE BEEN RED IF THEY WERE SHOT IN A STUDIO.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhp-FTYSGe8

https://www.history.com/news/lighting-simulation-offers-more-proof-of-moon-landing

2. IN THE FAMOUS PHOTO OF BUZZ ALDRIN WHICH WAS TAKEN BY NEIL ARMSTRONG THE SHADOW SHOULD HAVE MADE ALDRIN DARK AND NOT AS VISIBLE AS HE IS. AFTER A LOT OF RESEARCH, WE HAVE FOUND OUT THAT THE LIGHTING WAS FROM ANOTHER LIGHT SOURCE, BUT NOT A LAMP. THE LIGHT FROM THE SUN REFLECTED OFF OF NEIL ARMSTRONG HIMSELF. THE MATERIAL ON THE MOON REFLECTS ONLY 12% BUT THE SUITS OF THE ASTRONAUTS REFLECT 85% OF THE LIGHT. THE LIGHT WHICH REFLECTED OFF OF NEIL ARMSTRONG THEN HIT ALDRIN WHICH MADE HIM CLEARLY VISIBLE.

https://www.history.com/news/lighting-simulation-offers-more-proof-of-moon-landing

3. THE MOON LANDING CANNOT HAVE BEEN FAKED BECAUSE OVER 4000 PEOPLE WOULD HAVE TO LEAVE THIS A SECRET. EVEN THE RUSSIANS WOULD HAVE TO LIE BECAUSE THEY GOT THE TRANSMISSION FROM THE MOON AS OTHER COUNTRIES DID. WHY WOULD THEY LIE FOR THE AMERICANS?????

https://www.history.com/news/lighting-simulation-offers-more-proof-of-moon-landing