At a basic glance, political parties are often seen as ways to speak our values and beliefs. But I argue that political parties shape our beliefs and value for us, altering those that are not set in stone. With this comes the inevitable divide in a society which weakens the resolve of that stated society, which is seen presently around our world. An example of this would be when the democrats or republicans having complete control over bills and law making. With either party passing legislation to the values and beliefs of one section of the society causing a rift amongst it's citizenry.

The truth is that we are speaking in absolutes when there still stands a possibility that both are correct. Until one can fully be

Discredited accurately we cannot fully stand as one side as being valid and the other invalid. It's to bad we won't know until death...or more advanced form of science to breakthrough this barrier.

This is true, but the only section that I have a hard time accepting is the word "free". For free is not entirely accurate for someone has to pay for it. I do like the idea that a private institution (with good regulations) to provide this educational benefit. The reason is that governments are known for their ineptness and I find that a hopeful non-profit institute would be the best possible impartial choice. Any other thoughts on this would be great. Societies are only as strong as their base, and we are the base or foundation.

I like your post! Yes regardless of religion these are all things we can share. This beauty is for everyone even if you don't believe in God. It was made for us to share and respect. I like how this is going!

Now that would be a great debate starter... Absolutes and possibilities.

That is correct! I was hoping someone would say that. With a mindfully thought out process with good evidence, great debates can be waged.

That is a generalization that is not accurate for not every heist believes or behaves in such a manner as your crude statement, so your generalization is false and unwarranted.

I meant to say "that cannot be verified". Auto correct on iPhone is horrible... Lol now that's a good debate question!

When speaking in absolutes that can. It be fully tested and verified, I find that the truth of this statement cannot accurate. The reason is that we are not able to is that we would not be able to begin to understand the origins of how this research would begin.

If religion creates irrationale optimism, then anti- religion creates rationale pessimism. I find this argument to be a contradiction. For pessimism is not rationale based upon its inherent ability to outcast the party involved. Optimism however is indeed rationale for the basis that it is better for your health as well as your friendship circles. These are just a few of the numerous examples for your contradicting argument. Your statements are generalized too broadly for this debate to have any really substantive evidence. It appears to me that this is just an Irrational attack on religion. Be sure to formulate a direct argument that can be argued with good evidence for your next argument. Keep to topic and critical thought processes will pour over a cliff like a waterfall.