Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
_xXJulianXx_
| Reward Points: | 1 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 75% |
| Arguments: | 5 |
| Debates: | 0 |
WE ARE THE BETTER SIDE!! SUCCUMB TO US, YOUR POINTS AND REASONS ARE HARD TO UNDERSTAND AND MAKE NO SENSE, WE TOTALLY WON!!!!
Those aren't real reasons that support this topic, and you haven't even talked about the cost of transporting them and making institutions for them. Also, you didn't even talk about how they add diversity. You are on the wrong side.
I also think that source 6 and 7 are good representations of this because they show how it adds diversity to museums, and give more interesting information to people to show culture and diversity. And the two articles to the left on the back page support this just as well. And show how costly this would be.
These artifacts should be returned to Africa because they belong there. It is their place of origin and the people of Africa understand its importance more than anyone and would protect it well. They also deserve it to be returned to Africa because they are grieved for and should be placed in the hands of the residents of its creator. The artifacts are more important to them and are worth fighting for. Source 2 is a good representation of this because it shows how the Africans grieve. And source three shows how the Africans don't truly trust the other museums with their artifacts because it is of less importance. Kaboom.
I say no, they should not return to Africa. My reasoning is that, while they are in other museums, other people can learn the diversity of Africa and their culture, as well as their history. They should also stay there because it would cost quite the amount of money to transport. And what good is it going to do in Africa, where most people know about the history of Africa already. It isn't smart to do because people who don't know about Africa probably won't want to travel all the way to Africa just to see and learn about the history and culture of Africa. And it is more prone to theft/robbery and is less protected in Africa, and it would cost a whole lot more money making institutions to hold these artifacts then it would to transport them. Boom.
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
