Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 2 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 83% |
Arguments: | 2 |
Debates: | 0 |
I think the Flood Theory made more sense to me because i don't think the landmasses can just separate just like that. I think the flood when it came out and killed a lot of animals and plants and it was also probably very powerful and pulled the landmasses apart. I have to go with the flood theory because not did that only make sense to me but it had me thinking which would would be the most possible reason to this theory?
I think Pluto should be a planet because for one thing Pluto orbits the earth like the other planets. Even though Pluto is the smallest planet and very cold it shouldn't be called a dwarf planet. Pluto should have a right to be called a planet because there is nothing wrong with it. People shouldn't treat it like that because Pluto my have many cool things on it to discover. I hope that scientist make Pluto a planet again. This is by Ana Mckenzie
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |