Hi the Friendliest Ham, your argument is very good because you support it with a relevant example( Hurricane Katrina) and elaborate on it very extensively. You also answer the question appropriately and link back to the question at hand.

I think that you are assuming that nuclear weapons only bring about destruction and disadvantages. In fact, nuclear weapons can actually bring about advantages, as nuclear weapons can be used to ensure peace, in the form of a deterrence.

This is totally irrelevant. Please make logical arguments.

Shut Up Lah.

What you have asked her to improve on is not relevant to what she has said. I think that she has written a very good paragraph and supported her point with good examples. The links are clear and are true. What you are saying does not make sense and is not relevant to her point. >:D

This is a good argument because she summarises the problem at hand very well. Her evidence are also relevant and backs the arguement up very well. There is a link to the topic sentence at the end and she clearly addresses the question very appropiately and systematically.

dear varun,

are you sure that the "emo" people are considered a cult? and saying that they're a emo cult is not a proper terminology. and they're not gays,they're homosexuals.