CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Claireki

Reward Points:8
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
76%
Arguments:9
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
9 most recent arguments.
1 point

Even if it is barren land and not of much use to the Indians, the Chinese should have still negotiated with them as the Indians might haven had a plan for Aksai Chin in the future and make good use of it. Just claiming Aksai Chin for itself without negotiating with India is a bad move by China.

2 points

After building the roads in Aksai Chin, they created border posts, indicating that they were claiming Aksai Chin for themselves. India has the right to react that way.

claireki(8) Clarified
1 point

"They do you converse with you" ---- They do not converse with you, I mean.

3 points

However, this is going against their social and religious customs. They would make themselves less social amongst those who believe strongly in those customs.

-1 points

However, they do not reply to you or talk to you. They do you converse with you, how are you being social with them?

4 points

Being social on the internet is not being social at all. You might talk to many people online, but this does not mean you are very social and a lot of friends. It might just be allowing us to talk to people we don't know, but we do not become close to them at all.

6 points

However, most of us still use social media. Almost everyone in school has a Facebook, or Twitter account. The school refraining us from using too much internet is not exactly working.

9 points

No, we might be "social" online, but we are being antisocial in real life with everyone else we are with at the point of moment. Us being "social" online makes us less social in real life, which defeats the purpose of us being social online.

8 points

I believe that Social Media has made us less social. For an example, us using Facebook, posting statuses and pictures do not allow us to be closer to people. They make us seem far away from many, or make us feel that we do not have many friends, posting statuses on Facebook. Also, Twitter allows us to only rant about things and reply to people. However, replying to others on Twitter does not mean we are friends with them, we might just be clarifying something. iChat, too, makes us less social. Talking to friends on the internet might make us awkward with the person in real life, as we might be different from when we are online. We also cannot become closer to others through social media, unless we are sharing heartfelt feelings with our good friends whom we also talk to in real life. This is why I think social media makes us less social in real life, tweeting and posting statuses aimlessly.

Claireki has not yet created any debates.

About Me


Biographical Information
Name: Claire Dubu
Gender: Female
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Republican
Country: Singapore

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here