CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Graceho

Reward Points:2
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:2
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
2 most recent arguments.
1 point

Good topic sentence, straight to the point bringing out your argument. Good explanation. Mistake: "For example, Protestants might be taught a different kind of history due to the different perspective in the past thus making them have a bad impression on the Catholics, vice versa. The study of history can cause disharmony just because of what happened in the past, and it doesn't matter whether the conflicting groups have anything to conflict about today." "The study of history .. detrimantal to the peace in the society." Good ending to link back to point. Good job! Short and sweet paragraph. (:

1 point

Topic sentence is quite good, straight to the point. This is a valid example but too vague. "For instance, new and better drainage system.." Which country used a better drainage system? Maybe can give a specific example instead of generalizing. Sentence structure a little bit weird. "Learning better war tactics.. and MUCH more have been done to improve the situation in the world and avoid the REPETITION of floods." Also "People living in Singapore.. AS FLOODS ALWAYS OCCURRED." Example of Singapore not very valid because the recent floods have proven that our drainage system is not that effective. It is the learning of past examples that showed the need of weapons to protect ourselves better and not past mistakes. Quite a good link back to point, cause you summarized the 2 main examples in your paragraph. Good job! (:

Graceho has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here