We are not free to voice hate by United States Constitution the people assume the powers of liberty not freedom. We are at liberty to voice a grievance of hate by way that can be seen as filed.
A grievance is substantiated, or unsubstantiated and debate shares this connection with grievance. Most all things that have been create at one time had been imagined first so it would be generalizing an opinion to say real and imaginary. A grievance is a strong disagreement with some display of substance of dispute, this substance can act as target to be addressed directly. So if the substance of topic is answered it is no longer a grievance.
A grievance is an expression of self-value which may be contradictive to its appointed cost in the public. A grievance is a declaration of independence and debate is not. A debate makes no claim of self-value a person maybe assigned to one side.
Public fraud is about two things the wording and money. The grievance is Global Warming the conundrum is if there was an ice age there has to be a warming for the ice to have melted. Just to point out a United States that is talk about publicly when most people bring up the topic Global Warming or Climate change they are talking about Human Climate Manipulation.
When a group of people can intentionally add by knowledge things that they know will complicate the focus of research made on a public grievance/complaint they are in fact stalling. Global warming arrived shortly after public storm water runoff evaluations had been made. So who thinks dumping billions of tones of Salt and chemical dicers on frozen water is a Warming process? Who believes it is done on purpose by people?
Okay so if Mexico has found a common defense to the general welfare for Mexico on admission of guilt made on murder why has the principle not been shared with the rest of Mexico? Simply allowing one type of admission of murder for woman to go without judicial separation for public protection isn’t really a united state of basic right.
Everyone should pay for their own admission of guilt to a felony crime if it is found to be true. What is questioned is does Mexico have reason why all woman as a United States must make a felony admission of guilt publicly? There are some ideas of what makes abortion illegal. The crime that is publicly admitted as a lie. Is it the self-incrimination which askes all voters to take part in a felony crime.
Funny there is a lot of talk about Russian commission in voter tampering, yet many nations allowing the voter to admit or take part in a admitted felony crime which is grounds for vote restriction is Okay?
Totally unrelated to the United States of America.
All the Capitalism Karl Marx never addressed. Capitalism by basic principle is independence. Nothing more and it is the human Nature which initiates economic failures by use of philosophy. Marx was educated as civil counsel unbound to a United State Constitutional principle and become stateless due to publications he had written.
Two important facts Marx did not address United State by Constitution and Marx became stateless. Was this a coincidence, doubtful. Also all Capitalism would remember of Marx is he was by principle a capitalist as his belief was that Capital holdings could be owned. His grievance was over only who takes ownership as an understanding to power.
Socialism is the enemy of independence. Marx wanted the independence without the burdens of question.
The dimension of Time written as a Time Dimensional Expansion. (T.D.E.) Rights Reserved.
12:00 PM can become 12:00:00:01 the :01 is the 4th dimension of time and disappears when the 4th dimension of time reaches this point 12:59:59:59PM Time is simplified by mathematics to 1:00 AM
This time 01:00:00:00 AM is identical to this time 01:00 AM in accuracy by principle of time.
Grievance calling BS, by adding a decimal point the ratio 12:00:00.0 AM makes the whole thing less accurate period. Rights Reserved.
Still None sense?
John_C you are writing utter incoherent gibberish which makes no sense and follows no logical chain of thought.
Untrue the train of though is the errors which make General Relativity the corruptor of mathematic principle with the use of Pi and decimal point position. A numerical decimal position .01, 1/100th The ratio of Time 12:00:00 AM should not have a decimal point like this 12:00:00.00 AM it should be written and translated like this 12:00:00:00 AM the logic is to keep the integrity of the ratio of absolute time.
A Generalized Question: 12:00 PM occurs in and on all these places at the same instant. The Earth, the Moon, Mars, Saturn, Our solar system, the Milky Way, and the Universe. They are in a place of boundary called space. For many reasons the Time 12:00 PM though shared as one instant by all these places does not occur in the same space at that one instant.
Is Time a dimension of space? No Time is not a dimension of space it is mathematic. No straw man argument here. An answer is given, and the detail of the answer is explained so it can be found independently confirmed or disproven by debate.
Let me explain:
First: E=Mc^2 is mentioned in the forum as means to Space-Time being an effect of energy warping space. I have grievances related to your interpretation of General relativity but then we are creating a straw man argument. So back on focus. (gravity) = 8pi G x (energy and momentum). = (H=8piG) = ( E=Mc^2)
There is a basic mathematic violation made by ratio when Pi is used in relativity’s formulation to assume quantity of energy, mass, or volume. On one side of linear form or both E (Pi is implanted often by math never removed) = Mc^2 (Pi is implanted by math and often never removed) this is a violation to fixed linear algebra as the equation must detail Pi and exclusion.
The grievance is in the way decimal state is shared with Absolute Time (12:60), (1:60), (1:60) Uncorrupted. Absolute Time (12.00:60.00), (1.00:60.00), (1.00:60.00) corrupted. the decimal point is added to second under the idea it is adding accuracy. It is by grievance changing the ratio uniting to relative with Pi. Einstein loved Pi.
Kinetic energy is KE = 5.5 x mv^2 O
Mass M = F/a (force/acceleration)
Volume
1. Cube = a^3 O
2. Rectangular = abc O
3. Cylinder = Pi r^2 h X
When a decimal point is added to a formulation of Time a center and change of direction are implied. The decimal point is the new start for a linear addition of value to take place going on the opposite direction of the whole number. The whole number is not continued by use of ratio. Still giberish
Excuse me! Strawman argument? First: Yes, I set mathematic evidence on the boards saying that the ratio of absolute time is. >>>> (12:60, 1:60, 1:60) <<<<< The fact of mathematics then states that adding a decimal point is a corruption of that set Absolut when set inside the numbers held in ratio by it. You are literally presenting no mathematic rebuttal. Zero. None. Nada. Pi and the numerical state of decimal numbers like (.1, .24, .4617) are what makesE=Mc^2 look relative to time. The most basic math translation between time and space is round and square.
Clearly you do not grasp the basic mathematics involved here1:10(is the language of a numerical decimal ratio) and 1: 60 is a ratio of absolute time. Either these two are the same ratio, or they are not? This according to physics. It is you who are making the strawman defense because you are giving credit to the planarization of time by fictional physics/ Science fiction. Not mentioned above in the title of the debate.
The grievance is that Space X, Y, and Z is cube, when equal area as condition is set. (X= 10, Y = 10, and Z = 10) While if we write this as X=10, Y = 10 it is now square again not complicated abstract math. Absolute time is Hour, Minute, and Second. Times fourth state is degree also know by science fiction as the 4th dimension. If you like I will formulate it so you can write and explain how Isaac Newton might also explain the addition of multiple dimension of time and how it is then simplified down to one if necessary.
“Just W.T.F.”
Again strawman argument, Not! Is time a dimension of space? no and all of what has been written is explaining why.
You present a strawman defense to the grievance I bring to the debate. All you are saying is not related and you don’t act like you understand the math here.
First it is not all of physics I am in disagreement with, in fact there are laws of motion shown with simple numbers I presented as evidence on times behalf. I’m not asking you to follow my law of gravity, the law tells you why you are following that law of gravity. I am the writer. Gravity is a motion. People are an object that can be moved. Elasticity is energy one, modulation is energy two, and finally reverberation is energy three, when these accumulated energies are set to scale and proportion objects move. The motion is then called gravity. Again not a straw man argument. As the use of Einstein theory places relevance to gravity in topic.
So let there be physics and let there be science fiction. We both know that physics is science fiction when the word theory is place in front, or behind the discussion. We both know it is grievance when the statement has numbers as a direct exchange of principle.
The grievance expressed is based in ratio. (12: 60, 1: 60, 1: 60) then adding that Pi as an irrational state is abused by its relativity to the ratio of the decimal system. .1, .2, .3, .4, and .5 these numbers express a change in direction of motion to scale as well. They count upward form one while at the same time counting upward from .1 in the opposite direction. This means a premature numerical center is created. The arc of the scale is not equal to the curve of the whole.
So a square and a sphere are in general mathematically relative? Please share they are what both shapes?
You are arguing mathematic principle with the idea of medication, making accusations of over medication, or lack of proper medication. How original.
What is funny is Einstein and many mathematicians cannot see the independence between a cube and a ball, area and velocity, and the person who can is the one overmedicated. By the way Flora it is not a theory it is an observation of mathematical fact. General and Special Relativity are the theory, remember that is why it was titled the Theory of relativity.
What I am expressing is a grievance not theory.
Why Time and space are not relative.
Space is a cube X, Y, and Z.
Time is a sphere. Two or more spheres set by proportion can be used to remove the use of Pi principle and replace it with a ratio. ( 4Pir^2). Pi is the focus of relativity to cube not time.
All that is added mathematically by physics with space-time and the theory of general and special relativity is dimension of space changes from where you stand inside of the area. That’s it. To some up why Einstein is wrong about the relativity of time. Time is the circle to square cubit of space. Why time works in the square is 4 -90 degree angles can from a square 360:180 and 270:90 are right angle triangles held by a radius of circle. Form two circle we get square.
Why the plagiarism dictates that time must be bend to space is a square bends space to try and mimic how the circle creates the arc of every circle. Using algebra and fix equation at some point of scale the arc reverts to straight line. Many people may disagree as to why this is, but I relate it to motion and a need for an additional Pi described as yPi.
All that is added mathematically by physics with space-time and the theory of general and special relativity is dimension of space changes from where you stand inside of the area. That’s it. To some up why Einstein is wrong about the relativity of time. Time is the circle to square cubit of space. Why time works in the square is 4 -90 degree angles can from a square 360:180 and 270:90 are right angle triangles held by a radius of circle. Form two circle we get square.
Okay looking past the humor of short sightedness of mathematics. As a person who truly hates math I understand your choice of wording. Let’s ask a question that will piss them off. It is 12:00 o’clock on earth, there are currently 37 local times in use on earth. Wat time is it on Mars.
My restarted answer to the question is if it is 12:00 o’clock on Earth, it is 12:00 o’clock on Mars. So this is what we are not saying when we ask for an exact time on Mars, it is 12:00 o’clock noon where? The answer is we must be on mars to find out all we know for sure is it is only 12:00 o’clock one place on mars and one place on earth. This will take place at the same instant.
I question myself every day when translating mathematic time, I must go to work but will answer the question later. Your question of my translation is not taken personal.
The loss of mathematic principle to explain plagiarism. Absolute time 21:60, 1:60, 1:60 the corruption of the principle reads as follows (21.0:60.0, 1.0:60.0, and 1.0:60.0).The principle is that a cube is more accurate to define space then a sphere. When the final shape is unknown does it matter?
The saying can’t fit a square peg in a round hole describes Time. Space is the square = X, Y, and Z. Time is the round circle = 360 degrees.
The problem is space-time is a plagiarism of absolute time. 12:60, 1:60, 1:60 = Absolute Time
By the way I have to write this question so I can understand were your idea of time is mathematically, plus or minus 10 nanoseconds compared to what? An absolute time you and I both admit is not mathematically absolute anymore, and you don’t know why until the mention of different forms of ratio?
My grievance is not demonstrated false you are saying Sat nav is the system holding inconsistency’s with the use of atomic time. To point out an observation Einstein never translated a way to calculate absolute time so it may be taken with an object that is traveling faster than the speed of light.
While by observation it appears atomic time has a problem with just the speed of sound. I’m I correct?
The ability to increase and decrease mathematic focus is not relativity.
I can agree easily Time is not absolute. But! The grievance is it was absolute, then made relative by human error.
A dimension of time is nothing more than a detail of time. The accuracy of time can be increased and decreased like focus on a camera to understand an image of area.
Time is a mathematical absolute that was formulated, then written, it has a self-value. It is not a premise relating to theory, time is a mathematic ratio of (12:60, 1:60, 1:60) what it looks like t the eye is that motion cannot be measured without the use of the mathematic ratio set to as a single velocity that translate from energy by use of inertial force to scale. This is complicated to explain directly but might be better said as all motion on a clock is made at the identical speed it is just in different scale. This makes the observation wrong as you see the second faster than the hour.
The fact is space and energy can expand without time it will simply go unrecorded by accurate means. Space-time is plagiarism of the mathematic ratio as if it had no self-value. There is a ways to calculate mathematically dimensions of time. They simply are not anywhere near what they are proposed to be by science fiction.
DID relativity PROVE time not to be absolute?
Is it now called the Law of Relativity?
Special relativity is simple accepting that General Relativity was incorrect.
My grievance is that time has been corrupted at the dimension of second, by associating a ratio which is not proportioned into the original ratio. This forces the absolute mathematic to be relative by numeric corruption. As Special Relativity and Time now share the same numerical irrational state when they did not always.
It could be true, I may be an idiot. So I will need an answer from a superior mind like your own. Do numbers normally have two decimal points? Is Special Relativity is a calculus equation which implicates relationships between ration? If so does it required that absolute time be corrupted to give an appearance of its relationship?
It would be rude at this point, even maybe unfair not to try and describe what would happen to a dimension of time past three, and why. Time is a mathematical absolute because it is created in relationship to the principle of square which is related to degrees of a circle...
There are only 360 degrees in a circle, and the degrees are broken down also by hours, minutes, and seconds. Thus three demission’s of time. 1. Hours. 2. Minutes. 3. Seconds. The Forth demission of time is simply just simplified like many other mathematic fractions.( 2/4 = ½)
I respect the idea of all who have posted here and am not trying to issuant anyone.
Though not formally a part of institutional physics I have written a law of gravity which simply states. All gravity is elasticity, modulation, and reverberation. This is an addition to Newton’s laws of motion. As it describes gravity in such a way that is not directly related to the motions of inertia force, and centrically force.
Gravity has no effect on mathematical absolute alone, other than by meaning being used as a description of the ability for humanities corruption to destroy scientific evidence in some way. Example: The gravity of that action had a direct result in the outcome being recorded.
Time is a mathematical absolute to which space is part of by design. Where space is warped, only energy can be warped. There appears to be some concept or principle of mathematical absolute not understood if the hypothesis states space and time are connected in any way.
Almost all parts of the seen universe are space without time as the mathematic absolute has not been interpreted correctly by physics. Creating space is not a reasonable objective for scientific grievance.
Space and energy came before Time. Time is a mathematical absolute to which space is part of by design.
As far as time and dimension is concerned. Time is a mathematical absolute, and as it is formulated as square by ratio, this means when an additional dimension is added to square, the mathematical principle is proportioned to cube which is then capable of reduction to square again. Hence that is why Time is a mathematical absolute.
FYI it was formulated from a circle so all interpretation of mathematic motion is set the same way.
There is no argument for time here, it is only an argument of energy. Time is a mathematic absolute. What mankind has proven is that the math can be performed incorrectly and for the most part people would not understand the mistake.
Freedom is a word used to describe an object. Liberty and independence are words to describe the united state people like to feel but accidently call freedom. The rules of free describe a person conduct as being done without cost or self-value. Which is almost impossible. This is why the word free describes objects, ever notice that the First Amendment does not say freedom of grievance? Grievance is a united state of speech, press, and religion.
My understanding is the reporter writes for the press, and the press publishes for the reader.
Freedom of the press describes a basic principle, The United State is all writing hold no cost or self-value. It is only people who fix price as cost, or self-value on all and any writings. The first Amendment then goes on to describe a boundary set by free speech, free Press, within the distance of filed grievance and peaceful assembly.
Which is said in another words freedom is the loss of both self-value and appointed cost.
Gravity is Modulation, Elasticity, and Reverberation.
The effect of gravity is made on motion. Gravity was described by Isaac Newton as a law of motion. Gravity consumes space as well as the earth. Modulation is countered by reverberation equaling a direction against resistance show as density of an object.
Yes, it has to be murder. But! murder takes place in two ways not one described by religious definition set as words and admission of guilt once made by midwife long ago.
By medical standard a woman is killing a life by simply allowing embryo to go unfertile, while a man is then forced to murder countless lives as he would be chosen by a woman in advance, then used as creator of living substance to fertilize only one embryo to spare her of this fate of death by becoming creator of life in the Human Reproduction System.
No wonder there is a religious story of Adam and Eve the truth is a horrible fact of nature almost every-one is unwilling to face. And it is the year 2018.
Right now the medical and scientific world share one definition when life begins.
Slavery 1857 the reasons a slave did not have any described United States Constitutional right was caused by lack of representation of record on emancipation from united state of prisoner of war. As wording emancipation is simply re-describing publicly free as equal to liberty and it is not by fact that way. The point of the argument in court was made against the United States Constitution for not having a definition of meaning which could ever describe a man, woman , or child as not having self-value or appointed cost, and this definition is still missing today.
Ironically the liberty of the slaves of the South should be attributed to Abraham Lincoln by a Military decree as executive order, in services rendered by foreign prisoners of war setting a larger boundary for civility and independence.
Why is abortion right? Simple it is an admission of guilt to a felony crime made publicly.
Why is abortion wrong? Simple it is an admission of guilt to a felony crime made publicly with a transformable self- incrimination that can be cast on the public
Why else is pregnancy abortion wrong? Its use is out of context set by official understanding. The term abort is a pause/stop made in an official start of an event, by which a life threating, or dangerous malfunction is the motivation of paused/stop to allow a determination to either terminate, or proceed with the official process. The aborted process is allowed to continue till its natural completion.
It is Ironic but the argument of debate for abortion applies to a woman as she only ever pauses death created when she does not have sexual relations, or artificial insemination, not with the stopping a pregnancy that is on going.
they can be trick or willingly admit guilt to a felony crime and loose rights. Since you asked.
Keep in mind posterity is placed in writing within Preamble of the United States Constitution. This means the first order of a United State of woman should be, must be, removed themselves from any Admission of guilt of crime, or accusation of crime before representation before the United States Constitution, so she too can obtain constitutional right as creator, then partner in creation of this described posterity.
This process of description sets a legal fact all woman are created equal according to the law in this way so it might be witness to young and old alike.
Yes a United State can be set showing a right for the unborn to live.
First is Genetic human cloning, then artificial womb children, test tube babies, advanced A.I robots, finally children who are conceived by parents.
Understand something clearly abortion by its admission of guilt in a crime set a poor practice loose in a United State of Constitution. It is hard to make any arguments here without setting a proper use of the word abortion in the context to what it describes.
What we do know as fact it is not the intention of humanity to place a limit on birth by use of womb for all people as a single right, as medical and scientific precedent has already been made to make that impossible while the argument struggles with issues of independence. There is more than one group of people who are united as a single group by this question in Constitutional principle.
I am not prepared to make arguments on this level of principle in a basic fashion and from the looks of the comments so far there is a great deal of representation missing.
Not really, America as a democracy has influence elections internationally for quite some time politically. This means many enemies have been nurtured to a way of questionable ethics. To think maybe some-one should have understood we are a United State of Constitutional right a promoted a united union on Constitutional state comes to mind.
As socialism works with communism yet is the enemy of independence, and United State is a regulation set against socialism which limits dictatorship of communism. This is how a democratic republic Military command can be relieved of duty making it unique in the world.
Yes, I am saying an admission to a crime is legal even if the woman believes she is in danger, or is really in danger. There are several Unite states created by the use of the word abortion. Outside the biggest which is an admission of guilt, there is the transferable self-incrimination, and outside the transferable self-incrimination there is a miss-use of the word abortion.
Abortion is an official stop/pause used only on things to have been officially started to address issues concerning life threating malfunctions. The process which is aborted is either restarted, or terminated for safety. Abortion on the other hand takes place with a really woman when she does not become pregnant while she goes through menstruation up until menopause.
The medical profession and genetic sciences see the human embryo as alive and its life is simply extended in a couple ways, cryogenic freezing, and pregnancy are different ways of preserving a living thing that has already been documented. So it is the stopping of the conception process which is when an abortion takes place according to the principle of the word. The other circumstance is termination or female specific amputation.
The reason why legislation of law around the word abortion is illegal. Self-incrimination is never addressed to a standard of United States Constitution the crime is never verbally removed from the admission of guilt. The demonstration set to protect the United States Constitution is female specific amputation. This admission has no self-incrimination of guilt. this places all voters in danger of committing perjury or become accomplish after the fact. both of which would remove them as legal voters.
