So men have a choice to neuter themselves or wear several layers of rubber that can still fail in place of his rights?

That Is. Nonsense.

Giving men an option to financially abort assures them of having control over their reproduction.

If women have unilateral control over their reproduction, shouldn't men have some control as well?

Again protection is not 100% and you fail to recognize that the choice to have sex is not the choice to have a baby.

If the universe is conscious, is it slowly bringing a grenade to its face with the Andromeda galaxy on a collision course with us?

Life, liberty and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.

Have you read the constitution lately?

Girls get more lenient sentences when convicted of a crime

They receive 95+% of all alimony

Ever hear of a rinser?

Girls can dress however they want and still fuck anyone in sight.

It is illegal to remove a girl's clitoris while it is the norm to remove a boy's foreskin.

Girls can pee anywhere too.

No one has to wear makeup.

I could go on.....

Atheists are sexy. There is a facebook page to prove this.

Wtf are you talking about?

A Scientific Theory is an explanation of facts and observations.

Are you stupid? Please educate yourself before you speak.

How would we verify who has accomplishments and who has jail time etc?

We have what 7 billion people on this planet the reproductive argument holds absolutely no water.

All anti-blasphemy laws are just theists who aren't confident in their own beliefs imposing their insecurities into global law.

No, evolution was kind enough to women to give them eyes whether or not they use it is up to them.

OMG LOOK AT THIS PICTURE FROM TEH PAST AND CLAIM HARASSMENT!

Feminists have nothing to fight for in America so now they have to fight the past!

I am for it in the traditional sense of it being a woman who aborts her child. But I also think that this right should be extended to the father as well. Give fathers an option of legally aborting the child. They give up all ties, responsibilities,rights, etc to the child forever and he doesn't have to invest resources into him/her/it. Now that being said I don't want this to become the new No fault divorce debacle, if a father is going to do this he needs a solid reason. Like he used a condom and it broke and she wants the kid, or a woman stole his sperm from a used condom and got knocked up, if he can somehow prove she wanted a baby with him only for financial security, etc.

A decision like this should not be taken lightly.

If anyone has any proof that evolution is false then submit it for peer review and collect your nobel prize and eternal recognition.

I love the title because it makes the retards who think we evolved from modern apes consider their stupidity.

That is such a terrible argument to refute the silly joto you are talking too.

"Women are lazy!" No they aren't you came from one so stfu!"

Your guys' conversation in a nutshell.

Women aren't goddesses, they are people with the same faults as everyone else.

With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.

-Captain Picard, Star Trek: The Next Generation, "The Drumhead"

Let's all be honest here. Intelligent Design is just the Creationists' way of trying to subvert Supreme Court rulings and get their unsupported nonsense into science classrooms. The appearance of design is not evidence for design, folks.

By Kent Hovind's own definition of science Intelligent Design (ie Creationism) is not a science.

Then again by his definition Particle physics isn't either.

A cell is the most basic unit of life you can get. This is why both plants and animals have cells. Yes they are similar as you say, but have very key differences. (ie: Cell wall)

All of life has a common ancestor, and from that common ancestor life diverged.

Plants do evolve my friend. Take, for example, your standard tree. The bark on the tree developed to protect it from bugs and fungi and it does a remarkable job. It took them a massive amount of time to be able to evolve to the point where they could bypass the tree's bark.

The whole "whoever asks out, pays" argument doesn't hold any water for the simple fact that the rate of women asking men out is nowhere near the rate that men ask women out.

I believe the last study done on this showed that men ask out 90ish percent of the time.

If we are going to use the argument that when something is a "grand, time honored tradition" to cover up a clearly sexist action, why don't we say that women being denied any say in government isn't sexist because it is a "grand, time honored tradition."

How do you define it as abnormal? By that definition you could call a mutation a disease as well, which I hope you know is how we came to be as we are.

Why shouldn't a woman pay on the first date? Does the thought of you contributing to a relationship from the start scare you? Women, in general, wanted equality so why aren't you willing to be equal?