Not all of them, but certainly more of them. Btw, I like the way you worded the options "yes" and "probably". Those are definitely close to my views of how I see procreation (gag).
However, you can not actually abort a baby. It's already out. Of course, you could still abort a fetus.
I'd rather have a boy. I'm speaking hypothetically, of course. I'm child-free by choice. Boys aren't an easier to raise than girls. Girls may be more emotional, but boys are physically exhausting. But a boy would get paid more than a girl. Plus, I wouldn't have to worry about periods or teen pregnancy. Not so much the last one, but the idea of pregnancy is terrifying for a nulliparous woman. It would be worse to see my own chil pregnant. With a boy, that will not happen. As for girls being more annoying, that's an inaccurate generalization (but aren't they all?). Out of me, my sister, and brother, he was the one to go through an "annoying phase". I went through an "angry phase". Atypical, I guess.
Also, if I were forced to have a child, and it ended up being a boy, there would be less pressure for me to continue. We live in a man's world.
Atheists are complained about much more, but Christians tend to view other religions as being perverted from the truth. (I know this, because I practically grew up in a church.) Also, religious nuts are far more likely to resort to terrorism. Christians don't have any reason to fear their own.