CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:37
Arguments:42
Total Votes:42
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Thoughts on Improving this Site (29)

Debate Creator

Pantagruel(984) pic



Thoughts on Improving this Site

Add New Argument
3 points

Either remove the "ban" capability or keep it in the hands of a completely independent moderator. Giving the person who launches a debate the ability to shut down anyone who disagrees with them on their debate simply leads to abuse of the power. In fact I have not witnessed a single instance where I thought what a person actually said deserved to be banned. I haven't seen threats. I haven't seen personal information being leaked. In reality the bans are just a way a person can throw a stink bomb and then shield themselves from any blowback on it.

Grenache(6053) Clarified
2 points

And one more thing. If the "ban" capability were removed I predict in less than a year you'd see a completely different caliper of debater and debates in this site. The people throwing hissy fit debates would either be gone or marginalized. The only way they survive is by blocking their most successful opponents.

1 point

im very very impressed ...well said thiat is quality thoughts and you lay it out in just a few lines ...I wish icould do that im like tommy boy with my precious little pet.....please tell me someone gets that ...

1 point

Not recently, but there have been some problems in the past with spam, and people overloading debates with nonsense, meaningless comments, or in some cases, abuse. In these situations, the ban feature is rather nice.

Also Andy, who runs the site, is unlikely to make any such major changes. Partly because I'm fairly certain he thinks the ban feature is necessary, and partly because he is not a coder and is unlikely to hire someone to edit the site once more.

1 point

Agreed, I really can't remove the ban feature. To the points pirateelfdog makes, the ban is required to keep spam down. It is also not where I would put investment into the site.

1 point

The ability to up- and down-vote not just arguments but also the debates themselves. This would allow worthwhile debates to be more visible while the idiotic ones could be less prominently displayed.

1 point

Good idea! Never going to happen.

addltd(5144) Disputed
1 point

Actually, I have been pondering the ability for anyone to participate in a debate by providing the ability to up or down vote (vote yeah or nay to any debate). This would allow everyone a single vote on each debate, create additional interest and traffic to the site and encourage others to participate. That is something I would put $s into.

SlapShot(2608) Disputed
0 points

This ability already exists.

You can tell the worthiness of a debate by the sub category it's in. As in Most Popular. You also have the pie charts at the upper right.

1 point

well how about the ability to have a debate in real time like a colored ball next to a debate that is currently having more than two people on it so its not like a mail system pin pal ....in here it sometimes feels like your debating a prison pin pal.....also I don't like how some people straight up post bullshit data ....and don't have away of fact checking there lies ..and misquotes ...some people on here really think they are smart but don't have a clue what they are saying they throw out these flash bang grenades of thought ...by flash bang I mean they put out noise and light but unless your a complete retard its harmless and when you call them on it they slither away not taking any responsibility for a lost debate or improper facts...I think if you are on a debate and put up debunked or questionable science or math or use misquotes ...you should lose points and have a notation next to your lies and misinformation...these debates are kinda only skin deep ...not a lot of meat here ....im losing interest

1 point

Great idea!!!!!

I love the mode to be able to debate is real time!!

Why?

Simple.

We could tell how much somebody really knew about a topic, since they would not have time to look it up or Google it.

And works both ways!!

I have long claimed to be a science expert. A doctoral candidate in Biology. So some of you doubters could ask me anything you want and I'd prove my knowledge in real time.

Then we would really get an idea of who knows what around here!

Separate the experts from the posers.

Bring it on!!!

1 point

I totally agree although I have had to cheat it is impossible to stay within a wheel house and know more than some of these people ....if people are really this smart and this dumb at the same time ....we're all fucked ...

1 point

I like this one very much. Let me think about it....

1 point

I would like to see the science forum improved.

Vastly!

In both quality and usage.

We have an egregious dearth here of science geeks like me.

Seems all most of you every want to talk about in science is the old hackneyed creation vs evolution thing.

Which was cool.

The first 200 times!

Now it's a yawn.

The zealots wont listen anyway.

As far as proving evolution I have listed links and facts dozens of times.

That the zealots wont read or heed or even consider.

I would like to see more math stuff as well.

Which I tried the other day on that Decimal v fraction debate.

Thought that cat named jerber might engage my offer. Seemed like he knew a little.

But now I read hes a sky god believer too. From the Satanism thread.

Bummer.

To me a believer is a deal breaker as far as a person being scientifically savvy.

They ARE diametyrically opposed!

Oh well. I guess I have other forums for science.

Pantagruel(984) Clarified
1 point

More math debates?

Well, why don't you create some?

Let's see, maybe

which is cooler, integration or differentiation?

Is that the kinda math problem?

Or

Will Hilbert's Problems Be Solved by Man or by Machine?

To me a believer is a deal breaker as far as a person being scientifically savvy.

The problem with this site is that most people here are idiots (I mean, sky god believers).

SlapShot(2608) Clarified
0 points

I have tried to do math debates and usually get no takers.

And re Hilbert's problem......

Which one?

He did an essay that originally presented 23!

But I am assuming you are referring to his Tenth Problem?

The one about diaphontine equations? And if they could be solved with rational integers? (A polynomial equation with rational coefficients).

Let me know.

jerbear(118) Disputed
1 point

I would love a math forum what we talking here .....like polynomial. ..scaler theory ....I would just die to talk to some one who can throw in on scaler energy ...it's what I'm starting next so it could be a group build

3 points

I can create an education category, but couldn't put in all the sub-categories right now.

SlapShot(2608) Clarified
1 point

It's scalar not scaler.

......................................................

We also sometimes call it zero point energy.

Most likely propagated by quantum electro magnetics.

And what I like about working with proofs and equations in that discipline is that we get to use Fourier Equations which I have always enjoyed.

Yeah..people really ARE this smart, bro.

Hail Satan!

I sold my soul to be a math and science genius.

LOL

1 point

The only way a particular forum category is improved is by the community who is curating it. So, if you want a better science category, you will need to help make it better.

1 point

During the sign up process, users should have to provide a valid identification , like Facebook, so that we know who were talking to.

Pantagruel(984) Disputed
2 points

So in which phonebook ought I look up Solo, Soliloquius? I mean, that is your real name, right?

2 points

What's your point, sasquatch?

And what's with you Aspies and your vague rhetorical questions?

When creating a for or against debate, I would like to see more choices than basically yes or no; I would like to give more than 2 choices for respondents to answer to. Also, I would like it if more characters were allowed in choices box; sometimes the choices I give require more characters the the number allotted.

Pantagruel(984) Clarified
1 point

That is what perspective debates are for.

Three or more sides would become too messy; if there are more than two sides, just create a perspective debate.

HighFalutin(3402) Clarified
1 point

I've been on other forums that allowed for this and it worked out just fine. They came with stats, breakdowns on demographics, percentages and many other ways that were relevant and useful. For example- Who would you vote for if the election were held today? Sanders, Trump, Clinton, Cruze or Kaisic; that would be 5 choices complete with stats all in one question.

1 point

Ok I'm just going to say how about we stop talking past ideas past beliefs non of us will ever believe the other so how about we actual produce something ....there is a way to store unlimited energy in a fourth dimension and realise it on circuit completion and this can be done point to point in longitudinal waves and the dimensional power source is great than the strong forces of physics. ....if we a small few can work on this we are the next fucking bill gates of micro soft ....only with way more power .....we can shut down the banks and the war complex by empowering the individual in a dimension that is not under current law guide lines .....it's the ultimate international waters loop whole ever .....Oh and we can store info in there as well .....we can free ourselves from the slave masters and end war and need of cops or soldiers ...Tesla was working on a dome to end war but I offer if people can self heal and communicate without electronic devices and energy is always in store ready to go we won't pollute or buy energy ....

jerbear(118) Clarified
1 point

Got cut off there .....anyhow there are some either real good bullshitters here or some diamonds in the ruff ....we can change the world ...this is the next big thing if we ride the wave we won't be slaves to this next gen of tech we will have the whip in our hands .....

jerbear(118) Clarified
1 point

Son of a bitch another network error ....any how there is a guy on here I am Spartacus .....well fucking prove it guy ....let's free humanity ......we are held prisoner to 13 elite families the own everything and feed you people shit .....the next big tech boom is scaler energy if they unveil this and we don't as a people master it before then we will be total 1984 surfs to these assholes .....we can figure this out bust the bubble on them for once instead of them always busting bubbles on us ......slap shot your almost a biologist you can convert atoms to mole moles to grams in your sleep ....so 4 dimensional physics should not be a problem for you it's time to stop talking and start creating .....

Give me money.

-1 points

Ban liars. Especially liars who sexually harass rape survivors. ...............................

jerbear(118) Clarified
1 point

I'm so not wanting to have rape as a topic a joke or anywhere near me I have 5 daughters and this subject makes me ill. ....can we just not

SlapShot(2608) Disputed
1 point

The biggest emotional problem most rape survivors have is that they orgasmed during the rape, and they feel guilty about that.

I have this info from several rape survivors I spoke with during a psych internship when I was in grad school.

Pantagruel(984) Clarified
0 points

What if the "rape survivor" is actually the liar?

I mean, this is the internet - anybody can say anything and nobody can know one way or the other if what they are saying about themselves is true.

Sitar(3680) Clarified
1 point

Rape culture is when people call rape survivors liars. You were never raped, so you have no idea how offensive that is.

jerbear(118) Disputed
1 point

I love the alpha personalities here but wow rape is so not a good topic for dads this is more scary than the irs ....I use this as a place to not worry about my little daughters .....they not so little anymore but to me ........so this topic is just revolting. ....ladies ......