Sure there is a relationship. Drugs have a huge black market, which always comes with violence. If you look at the CDC data, you'll see that drug poisoning kills twice the people guns do. You'll also see that states with the highest gun deaths do not neatly overlap with states having the highest drug deaths.

https://wisqars.cdc.gov/data/explore-data/home

Children should be given matches and guns and showed how to use them. Children are allowed to hunt alone in all 50 states.

You're talking about whores and matches, but you think I'm off topic?

Make a list of the things you have sufficient difficulty with.

(This will keep him off my back for days)

When my daughter is old enough, while still a child, I will certainly cause her to use a gun.

It's good that we recognized the problem with drugs. We banned them. No more conversation needed, right? Moving on to lesser problems...

There's no basis for the claim that illegal gun use is greater than illegal drug use. Perhaps gun use in general is greater than illegal drug use, but legal gun use isn't the issue.

I don't think the father of the dead college kid is reassured by the notion that their kid's death was peaceful.

You think we can ban guns but not tobacco? Haha ok. .

I asked for an age, not a stage.

Oh I see, you can't be a supreme person because you weren't even allowed to handle matches until you were legal to vote.

We aren't trying to compare like with like. I am demonstrating that all the talk about guns is under the pretext of minimizing or reducing impact. If that wasn't a false pretense, we would hear more about those things that have a greater impact, as drugs do by a long shot.

Lol all this attention because I said racial supremacists are the least supreme examples of their race, and you (for some reason) took it personally.

Norwich thought I was limping him with racial supremacists for no other reason than he is the least supreme kind of person.

Below what age is a person a child. ?

I played with matches quite a bit too. .