CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic
pic


RSS Amarel

Reward Points:1696
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
97%
Arguments:3214
Debates:36
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

fascist will quite happily tell you that his political opposition are the fascists.

You're finally getting it. Not only will the fascist tell you that his political opposition are the fascists, but he will tell you that he is against them, or "anti" if you will.

1 point

Police officers must follow policies and procedures of their department, by law.

This is incorrect.

Before you quote laws, you should take a look at the law to which you believe you are referring. So far you have been wrong every time.

Amarel(1696) Clarified
2 points

Hipster kids these days love being ironic. .

2 points

I am anti-fascist. Antifa Is fascist. .

2 points

Nazis were a product of their chosen ideology. White people are a product of pigment. Ask a Nazi today and he will defend the Holocaust. Ask a white person today and he is unlikely to defend slavery.

You can't oppress by virtue of your race. You can support oppression or be oppressive based on your ideology.

3 points

This debate topic is literally misusing the word "literally". .

1 point

No race has any right to anything. Individuals have more right to the region of earth composing their real estate than other individuals.

Amarel(1696) Clarified
1 point

If you were god and had the qualities Lich presented, you would not need to test anything or anyone; the answers would already be known to you.

-2 points
1 point

The human race decides its own goals

No. Humans decide their own goals and dictators pretend to decide for the human race.

Which has already been responsible for the extinction of countless other species

Your really getting out there. Collectivist species go extinct just as easily and often as more individualistic species. Our species didn't really start to flourish until after the enlightenment, and the individualism that came with it. All you have in opposition to me is insults and accusations of lying.

if you are only concerned about your own life while a doctor next to you drowns then the next time you get sick you are probably going to die.

This one is actually pretty funny. It's as though your superstition dictates that you better risk death to save a drowning person, for if you don't and he is a doctor, you will get sick and die.

It is a demonstrable fact that you are a lying Jew

Prove it.

theft can only occur in systems in which personal property is legally recognised in the first place (i.e. capitalism)

That's like saying murder can only happen in system where you have the right to life. Mao would be proud of you.

So people "created" more planetary resources (i.e. wealth) with the power of their minds, did they?

This question illustrates your ignorance of basic economics. An iron bar is more valuable than a chunk of iron ore. More valuable still is an iron gear. Adding value to resources, by enhancing their utility, creates wealth. You would have us believe a man in a grove of trees is just as wealthy as a man in a cabin.

What actually happened is the individual profit incentive was introduced

No, it's always been there.

You yourself have proved this and indeed have banned every person who has so far been brave enough to debunk your rather myopic beliefs.

This is rich. You have multiple accounts, which have served to debunk nothing, and now you want to call yourself "brave" for your effort. Of all the words that can describe a keyboard warrior, "brave" isn't one of them tough guy. To add to the joke you do this all while carrying on about my supposed dishonesty. Your trollcraft needs improvement.

Individualism benefits the collective more than collectivism?

Absolutely. Compare the US to North Korea.

It simply made some people richer and other people poorer

If you had any economic literacy, you would know that trade is not a zero sum game. It would also help if you understood wealth. You don't really think gold gives one wealth on a deserted island do you?

you never bother to actually produce any evidence that the scientific revolution of the 17th century had anything to do with worshipping individual greed

Malthus was correct for much of history leading up to his theory. He was disproved after the theories of Adam Smith and the like were embraced.

People don't compete for the same resources willingly. They do it because they are forced to do it

You really drank the punch. People compete for scarce resources because they are scarce, not because someone says they should.

If it were true that "Collectivism was observed to be inferior to individualism" (hint: it isn't) after 99 thousand years of collectivism, then that would NECESSARILY mean someone must have forced individualism onto society

Your problem here is that I have the worst tyrants of history as examples against collectivism (including Nazis and Fascists). So far you've presented nothing but empty assertions.

Good one, and the collectivist is lonely

And if you don't think individuals (and the philosophies that promotes them) are social, what are you even trying to achieve?

a system which benefits those kinds of people rather than the altruists

Altruists don't exist. People who demand altruism (collectivist) are the people who demand things from others while calling them greedy. Preachers of altruism are charlatans or fools.

If I don't see you before the ban, then thanks again

You're welcome.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: How are religion, law, and morality related?
Winning Position: From the Left's perspective
Winning Position: All cultures are equal
Winning Position: Equality before the law
Winning Position: Manhunt underway for terrorist suspect. How's it end?
Winning Position: How does the Alt-Right compare to the Alt-Left?
Winning Position: This is certain
Winning Position: Color of their skin

About Me


"Formerly StickinStone"

Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: United States
Education: College Grad

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here