That's where I found it. At Harvard.
You found it on Google when you did a quick search, I have shown you where it came from because that's exactly what it says on the article, but you never read it so you wouldn't know.
Isn't it interesting that you would sooner attack semantics like a seven year old child instead of learn something by actually reading the article?
You're just propping up the full length mirror again. YOU didn't read it, which is obvious when you referred to absolute time, which is not mentioned in the article at all. Once again, you have shown us all how much of an utter buffoon you are.
There is no doubt that it is corrupt then. Even if part of it is true, NASA only stamp it when the BS needs a 'shut up, NASA approves so don't question it.' authoritative nature to it.
I have no idea why you keep harping about NASA, they have absolutely nothing to do with any of this. That's just a red herring.
I assumed your comeback would be the GoPro camera videos
I don't need to talk about GoPro camera videos because I've seen lots of them. So what.
I was talking about the flat earth model, the motion of the sun and moon which is simply impossible as a moving object will move in a straight line, but they are moving in circles, how is this magical feat accomplished?
it's still a design/destiny-map that isn't really 'out there' to explore but instead some kind of mystical map of many realms
So, it's all just a fantasy?
I've seen the GoPro cameras leaving Earth; they support the Flat Earther's idea of what's outside of the sky NASA come up with excuses for that too.
Stick to the truth, don't lie.
I'll explain it later (involves them moving by either magic or magnetism
Sorry, but neither of those are valid as there is zero evidence for both.
the first law is obvious if the third law is true
Not really, they are different laws. One is about a force being exerted on an object while the other is simply the object moving in a straight line at the same velocity.
You mentioned on another thread where I was banned by the cowardly BurritoBreath about Newtons laws, I'll paste it here where BurritoBrain can't do anything but rant.
The first and third law are actually the same law, I do not know why they just split those two elements of the same law. How is that law not operating in a Flat Earth?
The first and third are entirely different laws. Let's look at the first law - every object in a state of uniform motion will remain in that state of motion unless an external force acts on it.
What that law says is that after a force has been exerted on an object, the object will move in a straight line and continue to keep moving until another force has acted upon it.
The third law says for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
What that law says is that when the force is exerted on the object, the reaction from the object will be equal to the force that was exerted on it and it will react in the opposite direction. It is the second law that qualifies this law in a formula - force equals mass times acceleration. F=ma.
These laws are being violated on a flat earth model by the motion of the Sun and Moon. Both are in a constant state of acceleration as they move in circles above a flat earth. This is impossible unless there is some force constantly acting upon them in order for them to move in a circle.
Since the flat earth model denies the existence of gravity, flat earthers are left without an explanation and evidence for their model.
my article is from Harvard, so it kind of assumes the reader has been to high school.
Lol. No, the article is from the Royal Astronomical Society stored in the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) on a server at High Energy Astrophysics Division at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
And, you never read it, but instead blurted out something entirely different than what was presented in the article. You have made a buffoon of yourself once again. Congratulations!
Newton's laws are not accurate at long distances because he assumed time had an absolute value.
Yet, the article you just googled says nothing about time causing issues with Newtons laws at long distance. Obviously, you didn't read it.
That is literally information you should have received in middle school or, at best, high school. Where were you guys when you should have been at school?
On the Validity of Newton's Law At A Long Distance
The paper you just googled and didn't read is a hypothesis regarding stability of galaxy clusters. There is no evidence this hypothesis is correct. But, we know you just pulled it up on a search, because I just did the same thing and found the same article. You didn't read this in middle school or high school or ever.
You'll need to shut your stupid mouth or I'll kick you out of the thread.
As I suspected, you can't explain your claims. Here's how you operate:
1. Make ridiculous claim.
2. Ban those who question your claim.
3. Revel in your victory.
4. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
only the third law of Newton would be true under the coherent flat-earth model
But, the flat earth model violates all three laws among a host of others.
Einstein already debunked Newton
No, he didn't. He corrected Newton on a few points. Other than that, Newtons laws hold.
Sorry, you're really going to have to put your big boy pants on for this and try to come up with something valid. Right now, you're just shooting blanks.
I can and have
But, you haven't formed an argument for a flat earth, no one has.
In fact, we even got down to the very basics of violating Newton's laws of motion, which your claims do violate, despite the fact it has never occurred anywhere in nature. We then went on further to establish you didn't know those laws, couldn't come up with an explanation, so you just disappeared.
The fervour with which you loathe me, mock me and spit at my metaphorical face
I do no such thing, this is just how you react to others when you can't form an argument to defend your irrational beliefs about a flat earth.
perceive the truth without ego and sheep-think involved
If by ego, you refer to facts and by sheep-think you refer to evidence, then yes, that is how it works.
it is usually better to know something that most don't
You know as well as I do that you don't know the earth is flat, we determined that through our discussions on the topic. Your entire education on flat earth logistics comes from youtube videos of other flat earth proponents who attempt to show the earth is flat by placing a camera on a tennis court.
"See, the tennis court is flat, ergo..."
I'm not him
And, I'm sure you would like everyone to believe that regardless of how indistinguishable your posts are from Burrito's.
people from CD know me as FactMachine
Was that one of the many accounts you have in addition to these others?
If not, perhaps you could explain why you are as equally brain dead as Burrito, why your posts and threads you create are literally identical to his?
you didn't know the difference between a subscript and a superscript.
No, that was you who doesn't still yet know what a subscript is, then you went on to lie about what he said when YOU changed his story.
How quickly they forget. Lol.
There are no research papers on turning male mammals into female mammals
Your claim is that it couldn't be done, do you have evidence to support that?
ADHD, mild autism
Those can be found in non-transgender folks, a lot of them.
recent social movements made it faddish to claim the biologically disjunctive gender
What social movements do you refer and how did they lead to fads?
It’s fine that the powers that be don’t want to classify Transgenderism as a disorder
Because transgenderism isn't a mental disorder, so it makes sense.
this won’t make the transgender mind more well ordered
Sorry, but I have no idea what that means.
genetically male mammals cannot be turned into genetically female mammals.
And research papers done on that you could offer?
trans people disproportionately suffer from other, still classified disorders
Could you describe those and provide some evidence for support?
Either you are lying or you are purposefully checking into my user statistics
Of course, your user statistics show that you have down voted others, hence you are lying when you say you aren't down voting. Are you really that stupid? Wow!
You need a research paper
I would like to see research papers, studies and statistics considering that's what they are working with to make their determinations that transgenderism is not a mental disorder.
BIID isn’t a straw man, it’s a disorder.
That's fine, but it has nothing to do with this discussion, so it's a strawman.
it’s still not a well supported assertion
Denials of these well supported "assertions" are not well supported.
My position is that their environmental stressors does not account for all of the significantly higher rates of suicide and depression.
Not all cases, of course, but certainly a significant proportion according to the stats.
My position, rather, is that you are dead wrong to hold a position of disrespect toward those who perceive Transgenderism as a mental health issue
That's fine, I have no problem with that because the stats show them to be wrong.
Do you think that your opponent is mean to people with Downsyndrome or Autism? Do you perceive people with disabilities to be “less than”?
No idea, but it certainly would be disrespectful to lump transgenders in the same capacity as Downsyndrome or Autism. The World Health Organization has already made that clear.
I still have to admit that this kind of behaviour is much more prevalent on the left.
Come now, I think we both know that's not true. What's important is that both sides see the facts for what they are and we can see that Burritto is in fact really nutty.
Both of your sources make the claim, and both offer little support for said claim.
The first report is based on over 12,000 respondents and dozens of peer reviewed studies, how is that little support offered?
The second is suicide prevention, the folks who get the vast majority of details from the people who call in coupled with an army of health care workers. Again, how is this little support?
Btw BigOats, while we may not agree on certain topics, which is fine, I want you to know that whatever the discussion brings, I will certainly never stoop to this course of action demonstrated by Burritto when he says this to you...
"...you fucking neo-Nazi retard. Shut your fucking stupid mouth. You're literally a goddamned idiot."
illigal immigrants do actually commit more crime in proportion to their population.
Not according to the statistics.
When crime is comimted by US criminal gangs, it is possible at least in theory to track them down and prosecute them.
Yet, it's far easier to track down illegal immigrants considering the US gangs have far more money and resources to stay hidden.
you are only strengthening the case for declaring a national emergency. If these gangs are so hellbent on abusing the unprotected border.
Yet, the entire point to this exercise in logistics would show that a wall would never stop them. In fact, they have far more effective ways to ship drugs into the country, just like they do in any other country.
A wall is a waste of money, resources and time.
A physical barrier on the border can serve as a serious deterrent, thus significantly reducing the amount of illegal border crossings.
"During fiscal 2018, which ran through the end of September, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) apprehended 396,579 undocumented immigrants at the southern border. That figure is lower than the 413,377 average yearly apprehensions during former President Barack Obama’s time in office and only a fraction of the 1,643,679 apprehensions in 2000, when Bill Clinton was in office."
Motion trackers, cameras, razor wire, electric wire, and even flashbang grenades can be mounted on top of the wall. These would not cost a lot of money but be extremely effective.
Do you have any supporting evidence to show they would be extremely effective?
Yes it was you boring cunt. The same quote appeared in at least four British national newspapers. In quotation marks.
You're the worst liar. Not one physicist said they invented a time machine, you are clearly lying, or deluded, or both.
a machine capable of reversing the thermodynamic arrow of time could be called a time machine.
Notice that YOU said time machine? Here's the quote...
"‘We have artificially created a state that evolves in a direction opposite to that of the thermodynamic arrow of time’"
See how utterly stupid you are?
It was a quote given by one of the physicists to the journalists
No, it wasn't. Not one of them said anything about inventing a time machine, those are your stupid words.
The research paper was published for other physicists
So what. Nowhere in the paper does it talk about time machines. Again, those are your stupid words or the words of some other dolt journalist.
I've explained at least a dozen times "what is going on"
Yet you haven't, you are talking about science fiction while the rest of us are talking about science. You have no clue what is going on.
The claim that significant, disproportionately high rates of depression and suicide among transgender people is primarily environmental is a hypothesis which is not well supported.
Yeah, it is well supported.
https://www.hrc.org/resources/
https://www.suicideinfo.ca/resource/
Being transgender causes distress
More correctly, the distress is often from others who have yet to understand the world around them.
there are exceptionally high rates of suicide among transgenders
Again, this is often caused by other people who have yet to turn their brains on.
Having said this, transgender people should still be treated with respect and dignity, the same way someone with anorexia or depression should be treated with respect.
And, those who say such things deserve no respect whatsoever, especially considering Transgenderism has been declassified as a mental disorder by the World Health Organization last year.
growing a pair of balls so you can take a joke.
Oh I get it now, you actually think your posts are meant to be jokes. That in itself is a hilarious joke considering that nothing you ever post here is funny in the least. It might be funny to you but your posts lack any form of comedy that I've ever seen.
Normally, it would be said that you shouldn't quit your day job if you decided to go into comedy, but it's highly unlikely you even have a job, who the fuck in their right mind would ever hire someone like you?
