The fact that you just decided that I must be referring to "intellectual diversity", as opposed to maliciously stereotyping millions of diverse people, proves my point. The fact that you then implicitly insulted me further demonstrates it.
No, they weren't. You claimed that the Democratic party tried to organize a sort of internal coup in the Catholic Church. The only evidence you have shown has him explicitly stating the opposite. Redirecting me to the same argument does not disprove the claim that, again, rested upon that evidence. That's beyond circular.
....sexual attraction is a feeling. It is THE feeling we are talking about. You have consistently claimed that the feeling (sexual orientation) is a choice, as you did in this very post. You also continuously insist on conflating feelings of sexual attraction (what this debate is about) with sexual acts (which this debate isn't about).
Please, seriously, enough talking about sexual acts. This debate isn't about that. It's about whether or not an individual chooses who they are attracted to. That's it.
And I have asked you several times to provide a real definition of the word homosexual that implies sexual acts. Can you, or can you not, provide one?