Do you know any ways of using Marijuanna in good sides? If you know, it means that it should be legalized. You signed my words by your disputing.

Also, I can agree that it does not causes dependence as hard drugs(heroine, cocaine, LSD). It seemed me non-harmful as cigarettes.

What can you say about smoking marijuana because of glaucoma? Maybe it should be legalize, because of helpful features

The US blamed Islam in terrorism, but main terrorism in Asia and Africa. How Islamists can defend from US, if they attack Asian and African countries? About Christians: they form their sects, create secret religious organizations and with their actions, they get more recruits than Islamists. Christian sects are very weakly connected with Christianism, but they rely on it. These sects are strongly linked with criminal and terrorism. In Russian, there are very many christian sects and they create conflicts between religious people. Because of that, now, Russian Government started to arrest religious offender, but it does not bring help.

If religion fanatics intervene in govern affairs, they cannot be seemed victims. It means attack. This action means that, religion want to control the government.

You said that Islam as main religion in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan should control people. You words are heard as fanatical idea. Religion started to intervene in govern affairs, not government in religion affairs. The government just defends from religion. Religious fanatics were first to "defend rights" and they "just were need" to attack civilians. What can you say about it?

Powerful people will find way to affect on ordinary people. This method will not help.

It is isolated case. He can have important links with agents of ministry. In real life, it cannot be with other people. Even, if people create online democracy system, this system will be correctional, not honest. Everything will depend on agencies of web-site.

We should abolish religion as tool of extremists to getting power. If we do it, we will can prevent it. Nowadays Islamists tried to come to Parliament of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan. In Uzbekistan, there is nervous situation yet. Countries tried to fix situation and to limit religious organizations, but it did not make sense. Because of that, the governments should to abolish religion. If we abolish religion:

1) People will stop conflict because of religion.

2) Extremists will lose their main tool of getting recruits.

3) The government will get opportunity to destroy illegal religious sects.

I just express my opinion: It does not make sense. It has no help. Online voting can be the same. People will do as herd, which follows after thought of one man. Or, if you say that it can be anonymously, people will vote anonymously for themselves.

How can you define true way? Why do choose one method and say that it is good? You do not give arguments. You just say that your answer is right. You just repeat and repeat that we are wrong. Your words seems me fanatical. You have no any arguments. Why you blame me that my arguments are weak, if you do not give other facts? You think that only you are right and you do not listen to any other people.

You said that I cannot dispute properly, but you give the same arguments: you repeat and repeat them. When I started to talk you about another information, you had blamed me