Obviously there's a material difference between being handed a ticket, where there's proof you received it, and having one mailed to you
Hello hater:
I say again, there is no material difference between a ticket handed to you by a cop, than one mailed to you by the city.
The town of Paradise Valley, Az, clocks your speed AND takes your picture. I'm sure all of 'em do. I should have mentioned it before, but, honestly, I had NO IDEA that I'd get any pushback.
https://www.paradisevalleyaz.gov/153/
You'll like this one, hater. I used to drive professionally in Paradise Valley. I carried a Bozo the Clown mask under my seat, just so I could wear it while I blasted through their speed trap. When I went to court, I told them I didn't know this Bozo.
Bwa, ha ha ha ha ha.
excon
Well, this raises a number of questions including, if the offending motorist fails to abide by the postal ruling of the court and continues to use their vehicle when banned,
Hello N:
Nahh.. There's no material difference between an offender being HANDED a ticket or receiving it in the mail. If he's gonna cheat, he's gonna cheat no matter HOW he got the ticket.
excon
Are we to take it that you believe a child is not alive until some period after birth?
Hello Dan:
I'm sorry for not being clear.. I kinda thought I was.. Lemme try again.
In my view, a person is alive at conception, and maybe even earlier. Is an ovum alive? I think so. Is a sperm alive? I think so. Does the unborn have rights? No. Not because I say so, but because the law says so.
Does the unborn person gain their rights after they're born? Not fully, but yes. Do I think they should they get their FULL package of rights sooner? I do.
Finally, let me answer the question you're dying to ask. Notwithstanding the above, is abortion wrong? It is. It's just a tad LESS wrong than forcing a woman to carry her baby to term..
Questions?
excon
That's the debate you're posting in you pointlessly stupid moron.
Hello hater:
And, I answered it.. He's not sure if a baby is alive, and I'm not gonna engage stupidity like that.. You, of all people, should know that.
Try to keep up, sport.
excon
I find it impossible to interlink a black, ex-convict (criminal) atheist with someone of the Jewish faith of Judaism ethnicity.
Hello N:
So, you don't think there are Jews in the slam? Dude! You're even more disconnected than I thought.. I'm taking you OFF my Hanukkah list.
excon
I fail to see the connection between five bloodthirsty black cops beating the black driver
Hello N:
I don't think the cops would have killed a white man. I don't think they would have even beaten a white man. I think they knew what a racial firestorm it would have unleashed. I think they believed they had permission to beat a black driver..
That's what white privilege is.
excon
Show me just one solitary person on this entire website, who does not think that you are a retard.
Hello hater:
Well, there's your Jew hating ass, and 25 of your alts..
Whether I'm a Jew or not isn't up for a vote. It matters not who you line up on your side. I'll concede that you're not the only Jew hater around here.
Here's something to consider, "First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."
You're a socialist, aren't you? They're gonna come for you FIRST.
Bwa ha ha ha ha ha..
excon
They see people in their way of committing crimes. Why is that never your take in even one, single instance?
Hello H:
Yes, they DO see cops as people in their way of committing crimes.. Duh!! How fucking stupid is that??
Dude! This is the ONE single time I'll EVER devote to such stupidity.
excon
A space for Excon to tell us the most interesting things in Hunter's emails
Hello L:
Thank you for that..
I have NO idea what any of the emails on Hunter's laptop says. I haven't read them. But, given that the Russians or the Chinese MIGHT have tinkered with it, I wouldn't believe anything I read anyway... You shouldn't either..
The laptop was gathering dust in a repair shop. When the owner of the shop realized it was Biden's, he called Rudy Giuliani, and Giuliani turned it over to the FBI. Now, maybe nothing untoward happened to the laptop before the FBI got it, or maybe something DID. We just don't know, because it was never subjected to a "chain of custody".. Had it been, we'd KNOW, absolutely, that the stuff on it can be relied upon. But, it wasn't, so we can't
The chain of custody is the most critical process of evidence documentation. It assures the authenticity of the evidence, and that it was, at all times in the custody of a person, who is designated to handle it. That wasn't the situation with the laptop.. We don't know who fiddled with it, if anybody..
Is that tidbit going to affect what you already believe?? Nahh, it isn't. In fact, you'll SOOO disbelieve it, instead of thanking me for clearing it up, you'll call me names..
Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha
excon