A system where theistic people should worry about God dictating them, and people who are atheistic shouldn't even care in the first place. It's not a system but helpful mind set for those who have nothing else to argue about. I can easily say that God can dictate others but I wont submit to him because I have my own desires and wishes to bring to life.
Fine, I believe you. Neither did I take it seriously, I just went up to the first website which came up in Google. I just want to find the contradictions by this website users to post them. And possibly to irritate some religious people,
Even if your logic is persistent and true, having sexual contact to a dog for example doesn't make it any less vile or wrong. That's even funny how the title asks governments approval to fk animals, it just sounds insanely wrong. But just that fact, when animals can interfere with humans in some sort of way, it would make a good excuse to have sex with the animal? You didn't say the reason, or at least I can't see it.
I would tolerate a president who doesn't inflict biblical morals as laws upon the society much more, and kept my admiration towards him for his real hard work. - But i don't see really a point in voting for someone just because of his religion or culture, still I might have an idea. We choose a man or a woman who can represent us to other countries. And I wouldn't want to be part of the failure if that occurs.
I wasn't curious to debate on this topic. I was curious to catch out people who would claim that Bible is perfect,while they would debate to someone like you who's answer to this question would be yes. - Don't consider me being a fool. And such question as trivial as it sounds.
#PRO 4:7 Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.
#ECC 1:18 For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.
#1CO 1:19: "For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent."
I got one example from a website -> http://infidels.org/library/modern/
True. You know when people usually say that animals are our friends, and they are just like us. Well I would disagree with their words. There is a thin gap for me, there is no significant value to this debate. I just attached to one statement, and wondered how many people would odd out.
Agree, nothing more can be said. I know people who would've said that animals are like humans, which is nonsense.
You deleted my argument because you were butt hurt. And try to delete this one, you'll only confirm my words.
My avatar was an option offered in Create Debate as you probably know. And I won't give in to your interests and your beliefs about Satan. It's not for you to choose and judge other tastes, because it's idiotic that someone can't comprehend that each person has his own tastes. And go screw yourself for complaining about something that isn't yours. - Personally I chose this avatar because I am a fan of horror, since Satan is evil he was my pick. But I don;t really know why you wrote this but Satanists don't believe in Satan as much as in carnal desires and evil spirits. Don't try to look so ignorant next time by presenting yourself superior when in my opinion you don't know what Satan is and may mean to many other people during other history times. Satan wasn't always the same you know, take God for example. Completely different perceptions are being brought up by our society.
Killing animals for ourselves is cruel, but is bad same as good. It was always right to kill animals for food, it developed for decades and became our moral right to feed upon killed animals for our sake. The tragedy is when animal murder is committed for trivial reasons like fashion (ferret/bear wool). But that's the circle of life. We humans use animals, animals would've use humans for nutrition as well. But certainly being ignorant and feeling no passion towards animals we kill is wrong.
You know you can come up with debates only using this website//? I probably will spend most of my day reading what they have to say. I read the main page, and already the "heart" metaphor made me grin a little. But when they wrote Do you know what the definition of play is? If you don't understand play, you don't understand your child. I was stunned, how the F. they would dare to say that I wouldn't be more knowable of my child than they. The F. arrogance and stupidity. Definitely worth of reading. Thanks to you sincerely.
Happiness is overrated. The feeling which makes you smile or feel just delighted. I would choose to stay safe, with closed down blinds, turn on some music and enjoy with my achievements so far. Because that's what most live for, most people have dreams and fantasies and desires. A desire to be happy is common. But what could make someone more happier than knowing that his loved ones are safe. And everything what he/she has. Happiness is overrated!
It's not equal to fight for one side. It would make a bigger difference if males would support female needs. But it also depends what feminists demand from men, equality? I'm not sure myself so I won't say anything loud.
Those who care about Christianity will support their beliefs. Those who don't agree with Christian beliefs might protest against Christian favor. But in the end, it mostly matters who ends up not being screwed up. I hope that people will come to sense and will accept life as it is, and forget old ideologies. Deism would be something people should go to if that's easier for them. But leave those disbelievers alone. We have stuff to believe in, without hope but with reasoning.
Men and women are obviously different. People don't argue about how different the sexes are. The arguments come in when one gender has more privileges over the other. But in general bot genders are different. If they weren't different then I doubt there would be a big fuss over being gay or lesbian. I think that it's a misconception to say that men and women are equal. I like what DrawFour said. And I'm adding to it. Me as a guy. i wouldn't call any other man beautiful or delicate as I would call a woman.
Not mostly. You may like something else, the opposite of what you were thought while growing up. I think that not growing up impacts one to choose the sexuality he or she was thought. The society could prevent boys becoming homosexuals. Just by rebelling and trying to fit in one will observe what is morally right and wrong, and judge by the society. Upbringing can influence sexuality, but I'll say that it's not always true. - And I don't get the title. By what do you mean sexuality? I answered what I thought. But if you meant that sexuality develops from upbringing, them I would say yes and no. Sexuality develops by time. And Religions can impact with it by their teachings.
Accept on thing or decline it, both are possible options to decide from, unless more options come in to the act for a solution. So you say that freedom of religion is equal freedom from religion. From one perspective you are right that both options consider one topic. But as well as equality they are very different.
If one decides not to use punctuation properly and lowering his options of expressing himself in more ways. It is his/hers decision. There isn't any advantage to ban it, plus no one will care about such ban. And there isn't a reason not to ban it.
It's a mistake to ask yourself that question to argue about since it's obvious that no one can be sure of everything. Easy as that, not all citizens know business management, engineering or science. But as whole humanity. I doubt that we reached the limit of knowledge. One example of that we humans don't know everything. Is the space and further on!
:D "how can it when hell doesn't exist" - Does heaven exist where God inhabits? - If you don't really care about Bible, Hell shouldn't bother you because in Hell believe religions such as Christianity. Szandro's Satanic religion hasn't mention Hell as the home of the Devil. So no worry. - Is it harsh? Yes it is and even too harsh for someone who is presented as a loving creator. A pile of crap in white shreds to be honest.
It is true. Even if there are alternate outcomes, at least there is definitely one example which proves the statement to be correct. - Religion is one example. One side opposes another side, and each side have a grown moral feud between them which makes them to think that "we are correct and their believes are rubbish." Obviously the statement is true. Although it's message can be observed in any situation. Create Debate is another example where two opposing sides argue for what they really thing is reasonable. "One mans dispute is another mans words of his wisdom"
Religion thought to students should be an option, but not a forced subject. Students could examine each religion, and evaluate. Schools should teach them what happens where. It doesn't mean that if any religious culture starts a religious school for the sake of argument, students won't turn out being obsessed religious freaks. Religion was part of our culture for a long long time, and shame that we still can't live with it. It's an advantage to kids to know their environment. But religions should never be forced onto others. That wouldn't be teaching then, would it? Probably not!
