Alright, curious question is there a way to delete debates, I accidentally made another one for this so I would like to remove it

I've read both series and seen all the movies but when it comes down to a writing aspect the Harry Potter series has more powerful character development and uses better dialog to achieve this.

I don't hate the Hunger Games I just think that it has a lower character development and that the writing style cannot compete with Harry Potter or books like it. The character of Katniss is not a great one, she does have great qualities but they can be portrait as annoying, selfish and spiteful. I understand the wanting of a female protagonist but the way to show them it is not through the way of people such as Katniss or Tris from divergent it is to make them like characters such as; Hermoine and Ginny. These characters show the heroine qualities that we should all enjoy, but instead of being so strong and have their badass qualities, Hermoine and Ginny have the famine qualities as well as the kindness and strength that is what should be expected from this characters.

The male characters in Harry Potter are also better than the Hunger Games characters, I understand Peeta is in love with Katniss but the way he is shown is rather needy and aggravating to a smart audience, Harry on the other hand who is in love with Ginny doesn't go into this line of stupid although he can come of as a pity lover. But Harry puts the good of the collective and this makes him a much likeable character who will even sacrifice himself for his friends. Ron is also like this, a character who loves Hermonie but doesn't essentially beg for the love or guilt her into loving him back, he earns it through bravery and chivalry.

Thank whoever made this fantastic debate and I hope you make more debates like this in the future.

-YaBoyClack

So? most authors like Rick Riodan, Derek Landy and many others have based so many of there ideas from other books or mythology's so there you go. Is it a bad thing to base your own ideas from other ideas and he didn't just get those ideas from others but he changed them drastically.

-YaBoyClack

I am sorry but even though they are both influential books written by fantastic authors your argument can be argued from both sides. Harry Potter is cool and personally I loved it but its not fair to say that something like LOTR isn't as cool or flowing is quite unfair. The lore of LOTR is so much better and it actually has more explanations for the universe that it is based in whereas the Harry Potter universe just hasn't been able to do so.

-YaBoyClack

As a reader of all the harry potter books I must admit this is quite an unfair argument but as they are both fictional fantasy books written for children based audiences but what Deltora Quest lacks is the fact that it doesn't just allow access to a larger audience and it also doesn't have as many fans fawning all over it. I would also say that J.K Rowling has placed larger amounts of effort into creating the lore and history of its world so I must say fantastic job for Harry Potter, you win.

-YaBoyClack

As a true fan of the Percy Jackson universe and reading all of the books and have both movies my opinion of it is positive but I agree it is fake. But the books have influenced so many lives and teaches children to imagine a bigger world and learn the mythology and history of it all so I think that Percy Jackson is a series that needs full support.