CreateDebate


Debate Info

6
1
Yes. Who knows?
Debate Score:7
Arguments:6
Total Votes:9
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes. (4)
 
 Who knows? (1)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(40163) pic



Are we evolving technologically rather than biologically?

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2014/01/if-a-time-traveller-saw-a-smartphone.html?utm_source=tny&utm_campaign=generalsocial&utm_medium=twitter

A well-educated time traveller from 1914 enters a room divided in half by a curtain. A scientist tells him that his task is to ascertain the intelligence of whoever is on the other side of the curtain by asking whatever questions he pleases.

The woman behind the curtain, is, of course, just one of us. That is to say, she is a regular human who has augmented her brain using two tools: her mobile phone and a connection to the Internet and, thus, to Web sites like Wikipedia, Google Maps, and Quora. To us, she is unremarkable, but to the man she is astonishing. With our machines, we are augmented humans.

Our limited working memory means we’re bad at arithmetic, and so no one does long division anymore (we use calculators). Our memories are unreliable, so we have supplemented them with electronic storage (thumb drives and the cloud). The human brain, compared with a computer, is bad at networking with other brains, so we have invented tools, like Wikipedia, Facebook, and Google search, that aid that kind of interfacing.

We cannot deny that augmentation has come at some cost. The idea of biological atrophy is alarming, and there is always a nagging sense that our auxiliary brains don’t quite count as “us.” But make no mistake: we are now different creatures than we once were.

 

Yes.

Side Score: 6
VS.

Who knows?

Side Score: 1

We are becoming the Borg ;)

Hell, women already augment their boobs ;)

Side: Yes.
2 points

yes of course, i don't think this even a question. If we had stayed as vulnerable humans living in caves struggling to survive we who have developed many more useful adaptations. Instead we have no natural predators, no shortage of food or water, and no shortage of living space. In short, we have no disadvantages and so we have stopped evolving useful adaptations.

Side: Yes.

The question is about technological VS biological evolution. ;)

Side: Yes.
1 point

Our culture adapts faster than our biological nature. Culture changes how we respond to stimuli but it doesn't change our bodies. Technology, however does this. In most cases technology extends our already existing capabilities, but in recent times it has begun to fundamentally change us. Maybe it started with medicine, the usage of drugs, but what we are doing now is much more radical than anything seen before. How much time will go before some person volunteers to have his brain directly connected to a computer?

We are getting increasingly more wired up, the virtual world is slowly becoming more than just a fun and practical alternative to reality. Who's to say that the virtual world can't become our reality?

Side: Yes.

We get taller and shorter according to the time. Romans were taller than us, other ancestors far shorter.

Side: Who knows?
Nebeling(1117) Clarified
1 point

Is that caused by better nutrition or is it caused by a change in our genetic code? Both are reasonable explanations and one of them has to be ruled out.

Side: Yes.