Well than what do you propose? Living outside of any civil society? Because that's about your only alternative.

1:39 in

- The government proposes itself as the highest and only agency of justice in the land

- The government claims justification based on the SC.

- Thus the SC must be the highest and most moral contract in existence.

o Since it is the root of all other contracts enforced by the state.

- Thus the opposite of a SC must be unjust/immoral

- If A is just, anti-A must be unjust

LMAO, he’s using logic to try and prove a logical fallacy is true. No where does the Constitution claim it is perfect, in fact the authors knew it could not be. They said as much, and put in ways for people to change it when sections were no longer relevant.

Let me explain something, I know it’s fun to be all rebellious, and to take a little knowledge and try and support some oh so new and clever way to prove the inherent evils of the big bad government.

But what exactly would you or baldy from that video there propose? Would you really like anarchy? Would you like everything to be survival of the fittest? If I have a steak, and you and your child say are starving, do you think you could wrest that steak from my hands? What is to stop anyone from doing whatever they want with you or me if they are bigger or stronger? How will you survive?

Here's what happens in anarchy. It's brutal and bloody for awhile, then eventually people figure out they need rules to follow in order to survive.

Our Constitution is the rules we follow in order to survive. It's not perfect, but it's actually really really good all things considered.

That's so stupid I don't even need an argument.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________