Obviously, you can't read. Even though I said at first, it was additional government spending, I recanted that statement in the last two posts, so the fact remains that there is no real reduction in overall food stamps; the money is merely be diverted by cutting the food stamp program into the child nutrition program.

For example, put your best thinking cap on. If you have 10 dollars, but you have 2 dollars of new spending but can only afford 10 dollars, you cut 2 dollars from the 10, now you still have 10 dollars in spending because of the new additional 2 dollars. In fact, this is what is happening. No real reduction in food stamps, just diverting funds.

Pathetic, but expected - and I'm pretty sure that sums up much of your life.

This is typical of liberals where you attack my personal life where I haven't done this to you. I won't go as low as you because the one who calls the other with names is probably the one who is pathetic. Additionally, you have no argument or at best weak.

Title II regards what kind of food public schools, and the private schools who apply and are accepted under the act can provide on campuses.

Actually, there is no confusion of what is being read.

The bill gives the secretary of agriculture authority to establish nutrition standards for foods sold in schools during the school day, including items in vending machines. THIS IS WHAT I WAS ARGUING NOW AND BEFORE

What is put in schools is something that should be decided by local communities, not some government busybody in Washington.

Title II doesn't stop parents from buying whatever kind of shit food they want for their kids.

Good because I haven't said that neither what I am arguing.

It just regulates school food administration

This is what I am arguing. Again, this should be community driven.

Moreover, those nutrition standards that you seem to have issue with, have been around since the mid-90s. They're simply now being extended to the campus as a whole and not constrained to the subsidized food program.

Who fucking cares when these nutriiion standards have been in place, there are wrong then and now.

So, your admittance of guilt that liberals are too stupid to know what to eat without the government telling them.

But you hear "government" and that pseudo, Captain Libertarian brain of yours pops off. We get it, you don't like the government. Go live somewhere where there isn't one. And this is not me telling you to put up or get out.

I understand that you want big daddy government to tell you how to live your life by giving you food, someone to hold onto you when you are scared, someone to wipe your ass, someone to fuck your girlfriend/boyfriend, someone to give you a false pseudo sense of safety. So, I'm suggesting that you find a place with all of those characteristics of this society where you think it exists. Luckily, there is a place, China, Cuba among others. This is America where individual liberty and small government was founded. So, I suggest that if you don't like it, go somewhere government can jam sticks up your ass, and you will be grateful for that and then you will be worthless.

But stop complaining about every little thing the government does, while that same government is making damn sure that your ungrateful and worthless ass can still live comfortably.

Again, this personal attack is really unwarranted because it only shows that you have no argument or at the very best, a very weak one.

I said it before, and I will say it again, I think government is necessary, there needs to be law enforcement, military and court systems.

You can't pretend to be a friend of the poor or working class because you let your Classist sentiments rest all over your sleeves.

Say what you want, but

Actually, I want to help the poor and working class with providing them opportunities where many refuse any sort instead of dependency through government policy caused by bad government policy.

You want dependency provided by everyone else with nothing in return. You want them to stay poor so you can feel sorry for them, and accuse others of callous sentiments and name call others such as classist. (HINT...Classist isn't a word, I am getting the red line...I bet you did too.)