This should be an option, only if we were forced to take part in elections.

Term limits make our government work more efficiently. When you have people serving term after term, they care more about keeping their power, rather than doing the right thing. Career politicians are more likely to be corrupt and be swayed by lobbyists and special interest groups.

Earth isn't going to be around forever. If mankind wants to survive we will eventually have to move somewhere else. First we colonize the moon, then Mars, and work our way out of our solar system. When the technology will catch up, I can't say.

Easy for you to say, sitting behind a computer.

I would like to become president of the US someday. In a more realistic sense, I would like to join the military (Army or Marines) and after that I would like to build and restore old muscle cars and play my trumpet.

I dare you to try and turn the US back into a British colony. ;) *

There are still debates going on about this, and the supreme court has yet to make a ruling.

There are certain things that are good about the bill, such as not being denied coverage because of "pre existing conditions" and kids being able to stay on their parents coverage until they are 26, but the idea of government controlled health care just doesn't appeal to me.

Since the government would control the health care industry, there would be no competition and no incentive to do well, so people would have healthcare that would be set at sub standards.

I think instead of getting rid of this healthcare bill, it should instead be reformed.

They are either too scared to denounce radical Islam or they secretly support it.

I don't really have a problem with it. if people don't like it, then they shouldn't watch it.

He can help them just as much as he's helped us.