Most atheists have a very immature idea of what god is.....
....compared to say pantheists
true
Side Score: 16
|
false
Side Score: 18
|
|
|
|
Well, atheists are definitely vast intellects because they aren't discipline by god, they are free to believe in whatever they want whenever they want. This makes their views on god really unpredictable however. Many theists see god as a revered being with ground laws but then again there are MANY different views of what god is. WE theists have no MATURE idea of god because WE don't know him/her/it just stories and recollections from past events, we can just assume a omnipotent god (deism.) This question really should be: Everyone has a very immature idea of what god is... Side: true
1
point
It's like saying I don't believe tables. Incorrect. Tables are more or less ubiquitous. I don't need an old book to tell me about tables because I've been seeing and using them for as long as I can remember. A better example is saying "I don't believe in Spider-Man". Side: false
|
I guess it depends on what you mean by immature. Atheism is certainly the position of every child born into this world before they’re taught what to believe in or develop the capacity to contemplate such philosophical matters on their own. In that way, I suppose it could be technically considered an “immature” position in some respects. On the contrary, if you were to only consider adults and what their thoughts are on it, considering atheism goes against a great majority of childhood indoctrination, I would think that it be very mature for a person to fight against what they’ve been taught and assume the position that there are no gods. It is a more honest position and doesn’t cling to emotion the way holding on to a belief in gods does; it just looks at the facts and says “ok, well until its proven I will suspend belief in the matter.” As far as pantheism, I see it as kind of a new age philosophy in an era where the big religions are fading and atheism is being shown as the more rational approach. I’ve known many pantheists, ranging from those who believe in a strict form of a deity which would still burden them for proof to those who believe in a deity or divinity with such a loose interpretation that literally anything could be regarded as god making practical proof an impossibility. It’s sometimes hard to let go of ALL you’ve known since you were a kid so it’s not surprising that so many people adopt this idea that… “Ok, maybe X religion doesn’t have the right view about god…. But maybe this is god, or maybe the universe in its entire splendor is god,” instead of just accepting that “there is no proof, until it is shown, I will not believe.” Being pantheistic myself, I can honestly admit that this could very well be the case for me as well. I adopt a very loose interpretation of what god is or divinity is. With such a loose interpretation, it’s hard to prove wrong, which I think is what my subconscious did in order to cope with the emotion of letting go of the belief in god and heaven. In that sense I would consider pantheism the more immature position for an adult to assume in comparison to atheism. I see this possibility and yet I have no resentment in admitting that my view is somewhat immature, but until I have factual evidence to prove my belief I must confess that I am clinging on to something that quite possibly may be wrong. One must wonder why. Side: false
I don't think so. Primarily because God cannot be fathomed. One cannot fathom infinity and its concepts. Romans 3:11 - there is no one who understands; there is no one who seeks God. Nobody understands God. Thus nobody can have a better understanding than someone else about God. Side: false
Your rebuttal isn't accurate. You naturally can understage the words that appear on my screen through your personal language acquisition stages. What you cannot understand is God. You can understand my sentence when I use God in it, but you cannot understand God himself. Side: true
1
point
Primarily because God cannot be fathomed. One cannot fathom infinity and its concepts. I disagree. A person can use the word "god" or "infinity" in a sentence and I still know what they mean. Romans 3:11 - there is no one who understands; there is no one who seeks God. If "god" in unfathomable, then why post a Bible quote? How can the Bible be valid or describe god when the people who wrote it cannot fathom god? Also, your type of thinking here does not line up with the traditional Abrahamic religious beliefs; assuming that you adhere to an Abrahamic religion. Nobody understands God. Thus nobody can have a better understanding than someone else about God. But in your previous posts, you have described and tried to make others understand that there must be a divine force in this world. This is contradicting what you just said. Side: true
I disagree. A person can use the word "god" or "infinity" in a sentence and I still know what they mean. That isn't what I'm saying. You cannot fathom infinity. You cannot fathom God. You can still speak about it for an understanding in language, but it doesn't mean you understand the true nature of infinity or God. If "god" in unfathomable, then why post a Bible quote? How can the Bible be valid or describe god when the people who wrote it cannot fathom god? Do you understand your own question? If the people who wrote the bible don't understand God and neither do you is the bible lying? No. You have to make up concepts from the information presented. These concepts may not even be correct. I posted a biblical quote to show that no person can fathom God. Not even the religious. Also, your type of thinking here does not line up with the traditional Abrahamic religious beliefs; assuming that you adhere to an Abrahamic religion. I'm agnostic. I don't adhere to any religion. Also this thinking does line up with the religion itself considering I used the religion directly. These Abrahamic ideals that I have posted originated from it's text. Are you even understanding what I post? But in your previous posts, you have described and tried to make others understand that there must be a divine force in this world. This is contradicting what you just said. In my other post did you not see what I posted before I stated my side of the debate? I specifically said the following: "I'm going to give this a try. This will be a new position for me." You have heard of playing "Devil's Advocate"? That is precisely what I did. You should have been able to pick up on that. It was quite simple to notice. Thus no contradiction arises. Also that debate is irrelevant to this debate. If I were you I would cease disputing me since you have yet to point out something I can actually see as "contesting" what I posted. Side: true
1
point
1
point
1
point
That's the idea atheists present to mock Christians who force 'him' on us. If you're actually an atheist, you don't believe in it's existence in the first place.\ No "no true Scotsman fallacy" here since the definition of an atheist is one who lacks belief in a supreme deity. Side: false
I would think Pantheism is less mature. If we are talking about maturity as how thought out the idea is. Pantheism associates everything with god, which seems like a very basic idea, one that is endorsed by Theists. Theists have developed a concept where god has been "concentrated" and given properties. Doesn't that require more maturation of the idea? Side: false
1
point
"Most atheists have a very immature idea of what god is...." First of all, there is no proof there is a god, so believing in something that isn't proven is immature. Second, with all the vast amount of scientific research and millions of dollars spent to find out more about humans and the world, theists STILL ignore these facts to believe in their still "unproven" god. You think atheists are immature? I think ignorance is immature. Side: false
A more accurate way to phrase this debate is: Most atheists have a very immature idea of what/who the "blank" god is. Atheist don't hold a belief in any gods, so we can only evaluate the claims of gods we are presented. . My position is that most atheists have an immature idea of the Christian god, but that is a result of most Christians presenting an immature idea of the Christian god to them. While this idea may be theologically immature, it is an accurate idea in the context of the Christians that hold it. . If you were referring to a different god, I would be happy to address it. Side: false
1
point
|