CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Start your own community!

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


RSS Atypican

Reward Points:4655
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
94%
Arguments:3374
Debates:469
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
atypican(4655) Clarified
1 point

Inbreeding within a family leads to a substantial increase in birth defects when procreating.

Granted. But would you grant that inbreeding is basically the cause of what we call races, and further that racism depends on this kind of inbreeding?

No such substantial increase occurs from same-race procreation.

Was there a study you know of comparing rates of birth defects between interracial and intra-racial births? Let's suppose hypothetically that todays most common intra-racial pregnancy is 5 times less likely to result in a birth defect than if first cousins mated. If a study showed that interracial pregnancies were 5 times less likely than intra-racial pregnancies to produce a baby with birth defects would this not justify outlawing them by the same rationale that we ban incest?

atypican(4655) Clarified
1 point

If you support laws prohibiting consensual procreation between certain adults due to having too close of a family relationship. This would be I think the most common position. I extend the logic of this position and assume it is scientifically well understood that myriad health problems arise with "inbreeding".. I was imagining hypothetically, laws against procreating within ones own race.. I thought it would be interesting to hear someone argue against implementing such a law, and for me to defend it. I find the subject difficult I could argue either position and feel comfortable with neither.

atypican(4655) Clarified
1 point

Is your position that the state should have no say at all over adult consensual procreation partner choices?

atypican(4655) Clarified
1 point

I think the headline used hyperbole to be provocative.

Is the guy who get punched a hypocrite for punching back?

Its not that my feelings were hurt I just get very irritated. You saying I am stupid doesn't make me feel that way...sorry

atypican(4655) Clarified
1 point

Love the way you quoted me out of context there conveniently removing where I said "if you can't tell he is talking about US wars....you are stupid"

You couldn't tell it was just an underhanded jab in response to yours?

So great you are rude AND dishonest

I have had good debates before with honest respectful people. But they have all left the site...likely due to dickheads like you.

atypican(4655) Clarified
1 point

Yeah people like you get to be more rude than you would be IRL. So any hope of good conversation and debate goes out the window.

atypican(4655) Clarified
1 point

Yes. Rude people like you make me want to fight....not verbally

1 point

I will only give you credit if you are serious. If you are we can post a video afterwards :)

atypican(4655) Clarified
1 point

I re-read and you are correct. I think I was irritable from our last debate where we were arguing fractional reserve banking.

atypican(4655) Clarified
1 point

Neither comment you quoted is a direct insult. But an if the shoe fits insult.

About Me


"I help raise cats for "not herding" Please send links to where I failed to address valid points."

Biographical Information
Name: David Janca
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: United States
Postal Code: 87321
Websites: My Twitter

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here