CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Start your own community!

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


RSS
Check out our RSS feed generator where you can personalize your own debate feed!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Swryght

Reward Points:125
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
92%
Arguments:105
Debates:7
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:
5hrs ago

Joined:
4 years ago
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Loneliness sucks. In a crisis situation, I expect you could learn to appreciate even your worst enemy if your lives depended on it. Facing adversity together tends to strengthen interpersonal bonds.

2 days ago
2 points

Interestingly, this seems to be the same issue you and I were having on another debate. Arguing that some of the bible should not be taken literally is different from saying that none of it should be taken literally. I am arguing the former position, as I believe you are as well. Therefore, we are yet again in agreement, but you seem to think my view is opposed to yours. I hope I am not being condescending, but there is a difference between the concept of 'some' and 'all' that you seem to be systematically ignoring.

9 days ago
2 points

Guilty as charged! However, this is irrelevant to the debate. If we want to go down that road though, you're the one who has made 1374 posts on a debate website in fewer than 3 months (average = ~16 posts/day). Ergo: Nerd! ;)

9 days ago
2 points

"Madman" is an obsolete and oppressive phrase dating from a time when we did not understand mental illness as well as we do today. 'Mental illness' is not a single disease, but rather many clusters of more than 300 identified mental disorders. Are you arguing that any mentally ill person who is receiving support (e.g., psychotherapy, medication, assistance from family/community) is a tyrant? This is manifestly untrue. Only complete ignorance and/or inexperience of/with mental illness could produce such a bizarre belief.

9 days ago
1 point

"Fictitious" does not mean false or untrue, and I don't think the framer of this debate was making that argument. Rather, he/she was simply pointing out the value of interpreting scripture in a non-literal fashion.

9 days ago
1 point

Not all symbolic interpretations of religious scripts are absolutist attempts to nail down one perspective on the truth. Check out Joseph Campbell's work for a very interesting example of this (I recommend Myths to Live By as an introduction). His approach is pluralistic, and interprets religion as a metaphorical attempt to help human beings live a full and psychologically healthy life. He is almost certainly an atheist in the metaphysical sense, but he believes the metaphors in religious texts are psychologically powerful and helpful.

9 days ago
1 point

While I agree with you that religious stories are often interpreted as conveying a dogmatic perspective on truth, I think this is intrinsic to the most popular interpretations, rather than the texts/stories themselves.

9 days ago
2 points

"Mental ilness means that they are physically incapable of clear thinking"

I would be interested to see your evidence for such an absolute belief. Mental illness is not the same as unclear thinking or incapacity for logical thought. Many of the greatest thinkers in human history struggled with mental illness, and the same is true today. You are laboring under the burden of outdated stereotypes, and ignorance regarding the nature of mental illness.

11 days ago
Swryght(125) Clarified
2 points

Mocking the mentally ill does no credit to your character nor to whatever point you are trying to make.

12 days ago
2 points

The word "all" means each member of a group without exception. Disagreeing with this statement: "Should all mentally ill people be prevented from owning guns?" is absolutely not the same as saying there should be no restrictions.

12 days ago

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Female
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: United States

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here


About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons
©2014 TidyLife, Inc. All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Debate Forum | Big shout-outs to The Bloggess and Andy Cohen.