Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 13 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 80% |
Arguments: | 3 |
Debates: | 2 |
God taking all in the balance.
After someone die, body usually decomposes and devotes to the ground (+ gives benefit to the soil) and today you can not find anyone who stumble because of corpses lying on the ground.A human was created from sand and to sand again his return is supposed to be. Scientists proved that human has similar chemical composition with sand, especially it comes out mostly with our skin.
Concerning your argument about exhuming and other outrages over dead bodies I want to say that, that today is a different century. Time changed. Generation changed. Traditions changed. Nowadays no one put some valuable things together in a yawner as it was 1000 years ago.
I'm against cremation, because it isn't humane attitude to people who left this world and also the process itself contradicts many religious aspects.
Yes, I believe that it should. Of course, there's no such thing as "free" medical care, so we'll have to pay for it one way or another, but we need a system to nationalize the health care industry and take the profit right out of the equation. This includes the hospitals and insurance providers, including malpractice insurance providers. Taking the profit out of the equation would leave enough money to cover a whole lot of uninsured people.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |