CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Blaqwhyt

Reward Points:3
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:3
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
3 most recent arguments.
2 points

There are bibles that come with pictures and other 'artist impressions' along-side verses and representation. They are available in the market. Are the content (in terms of verses and passages) of these bibles with pictures any different from the ones in pure text? Furthermore, what impact are you speaking of? Quantify it, and qualify it, or your point does not stand.

2 points

Firstly you stated that these students are "in [the] elementary level." Secondly, you suggested that their information processing ability "may not be that good enough". The above two are your premises. This is your objective: to send a direct and simple information. This is where the problem is. Pictures require interpretation as much as words do. Pictures earn their meaning from how they are used in the real world (something that elementary students have not spent much time in). For instance, one only understands the image of a simple man as a symbol for the toilet if he has seen the symbol at public toilets. A word "toilet" may suffice for the child to understand. Also, it really depends on whether the elementary student has a better affinity for words, or for pictures. At the stage of development you have defined, the child's mental framework is still developing. One cannot ascertain whether the child processes images or words more readily. Hence, your sweeping statement cannot stand because pictures and words may take a more peripheral role based on circumstance, and upbringing.

2 points

Pictures have proven to be quintessential tools for political change, reform, and influence. Reformist presidential canditate Mir Hossein Mousavi has used pictures among another media to sway young voters in bid to remove then President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Shi'ite cleric Mohammad Ali Abtahi attributed Mr Mousavi's success in consolidating the votes of youth to Mr Mousavi's use of political imagery and Mr Ahmadinajad's stubborn believe of using only rhetoric and speeches to persuade. Clearly, certain political circumstances provide the premise for pictures to take on a more effective role.

Blaqwhyt has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here