Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 0 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 74% |
Arguments: | 5 |
Debates: | 0 |
So you're saying that if we let them in then that wouldn't make ISIS target us also?
Those "tests" are never a sure way to "weed them out". It's impossible to know for sure whether or not they are terrorists. I might consider your argument if in the past we were able to apprehend such threats. But we have had many terrorists attacks on the United States which shows it's not possible to stop terrorism. But it is possible to prevent it by shutting possible hostile people out of the United States.
Yes, we do have terrorist in America already. So like I said, why would you let in more potential terrorists? Whether they are men, women, or children. They could all be possible threats.
It's not America's fault that there is pressure on those areas. It's those specific places fault for letting refugee's in, in the first place. It gave Syrians the illusion that they can be safe inn that specific area. It's not Americas fault.
ISIS has publicly announced that they will be coming to the United States. So I believe that letting Syrian refugees in would be a direct gateway to ISIS terrorists. Sure, terrorism itself is inevitable but keeping Syrians out could prevent more possible terrorists on top of the possible ones we already have.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |