Yea but Europe has taken in a lot more than 10,000 refugees. We would only be taking in 10,000 and with the number of them that went to Europe I'm surprised they didn't find more than 4,000

You're right we would only be helping 10,000 people but what about the places like Germany that are taking in 800,000? They know that there isn't a country that's gonna take them all in they also know that they will have to go to different places and those places have their limits. We already are trying to help them by sending them stuff and it's obviously not working if they're still leaving. When you say that things would be better if they had the right guy in charge you do know that all of this started cause they tried to get one right? This whole conflict started because they didn't want Assad and now he's scaring them out of 'his' country.

To bring up what you said about the high number of ISIS followers from our 'shipment' of 10,000. Germany has taken in way more than 10,000 refugees (800,000) and no ISIS attacks so far. Although ISIS has openly admitted to coming in along with the refugees there is still a bgger number of innocent people coming in.

Syrian refugees should be allowed into the United States, most people that would be trying to get into the United States are women and children. More than 6.6 million people are injured already and the number will only increase if we don't allow those innocent people a place to flee to. Germany has already excepted over 800,000 refugees and that seemed to be their limit. All we are expected to take in are a little over 10,000. This is definitely under our limit of refugees we can take in at one time.