Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 2 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 2 |
Debates: | 0 |
2 arguments...#1 does government have an abiding interest in outlawing it, and i for one, can not figure out any reason. (same would go for gay marriage and would support why pedophilia would never be legal)
2nd argument from a practical standpoint it makes a ton of logistical sense in terms of being able to manage childcare, managing the home, while having multiple incomes
i do not think that it is necessarily sexist. it would depend on the people themselves. i can also see that it may strengthen marriage, may reduce the numbers of mostly men causing divorce by having affairs and reduce the number of children being raised by single mothers etc...
i support the idea of plural marriages where any of the spouses can bring in additional partners. you would obviously have to work out the rules and it would not be for everyone, but going back to argument #1, i don't think government has a good reason to outlaw
generally speaking, estimated to be 12 to 20 million illegal immigrants. they account for what 5 % of population? so... kicking them out will right off the top reduce the economy by an equivalent amount. heritage foundation estimates at least 1% drop in economy (that's $100 billion in output) in addition, study indicates that immigrants in general start small businesses at double the rate of native whites. going back to population illegals account for 9-12 percent of our population growth and they are overwhelmingly young meaning that they will account for a substantial portion of paying for medicare in the future, since native population is barely reproducing itself (average family has 1.2 kids?) in the 15th century, spain and portugal ruled the world. during the inquisition, they decided to kick out all the jews. result...they fell off the map in terms of power, economy, empire, innovation, from which they have never fully recovered. we need and benefit from an ever replacing immigrating population. yes, there are costs, but they are fully recovered in maintaining our country as the greatest country in the world (if we could just fix our politics, but that's another debate)
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |