hey. punctuation. is. just. as. vital. as. anything. but. i. have. literary. licence. and. i. choose. to. use. it. as. i. please. besides i know you'll still reply to my arguments/debates you like to argue as do i and it gives you someone to argue with besides your never gonna let me have the last word are you? cuz thats not very fun. and you know that by refusing to answer it only proves that i have a superior intellect and you have crumbled to my logic. (which is the same if you do respond since thats what i said you would) your only hope is to respond with a better argument and refrain from being angry and swearing (i'm not saying you swear) since a being of your intellect should be able to string a reply together to show your intellect.

i await your reply or not you decide.

it was the origonal manuscript which has been edited out and i've not read it cover to cover just parosed through it

well the ocean its more uptainable offers more benifets and its easier to get too space is cool but not verry helpfull and takes too long to get anywhere

not right now we first need to deal with the recession and develop faster transportation before investing in space is worth while there are resources out there but it is not cost efficeint and curently space has no pay offs

if he would've signed it imeadiatly it would've been better but with how long he took to visit and make a party out of it which was such a waste of time he should never of rushed it through to get made then it would address the problem rather than through money at it if a crack was found in the hoover dam duct tape even with its ungodly abillities would not do the trick so if he was in a hurry to have it he should've signed it on congresses steps but he took so long he might as well of just let it become law without signing it

well i'm not a liberal and i'm not sure why that is and the reson i'm even posting is since noone else has and the only way to get people to is to start something besides there needs to be a little nonsense everywhere so in closing i'd like to say a few words

fish

pony

bill

ambidextrous

non-saturated fat

and

living forevor with just five years worth of memories wouldn't be worth it it would be lonely and kinda sad to not remember anyone five years after you met them

there are only for possible out comes

1.there is no God and You don't believe

2.there is a God and you don't believe

3.there is no God And you believe

4.there is a God and you believe

well if #1 is right no harm no fowl

if #2 then you end up lost or punished for your non-belief not a very benificial circumstance

if its #3 then you'll live a good life help the world and die with people saying you were a good person

if its #4 then you live like #3 but your rewarded after death and are happy which is benificial

so after that even if there is no God believing would have the most benifit since you wouldn't have trouble with the laws or drugs or other teachings of your religion you can't get hurt for being spirutual or a religious person except where you are persucuted for your beliefs

well heres my idea if i put it in a fedrally protected bank and get a 2% yearly intrest on it and only take the intrest out it would add 20,000 to my yearly salery whitc is a nice little bonus each that would only take 50 years to eaqual 1 million dollars and that may be a while away but hey i'm young i may actually make it to 50 years twice. that is a little hard to believe i'd actually save it. most likely half of it would be taxed away then all my family would want some so i'd probably buy a house, a car and land and let them fight over the rest

well firstly notting the projectory of nuclear rockets is highly ineffective so when we prepared to fire russia in particular would arm and wait for us to fire or they may fire early leading to the same results as "ze end of ze world" found on youtube leaving australia saying "wtf mate"

little do you relize the pointlessness of this argument chuck norris and masterchief are one in the same

little do you know master chief is chuck norris

well that brings us to the conundrum how will the earth end will it be through nuclear explosions, astroid strike, the sun running out of fuel, or a deseise that destroys all life, in which case if the desease spread by a bacteria the bacteria would be left, but if its a nuclear bomb only cocroaches and rats will survive the nuclear winter, and in the case of an astroid it will be whichever species is farthest from the impact zone which could be a human, but most likely it will be in a few billion years when the sun dies out and engulfs earth at which point evolution would have new species covering it and the humans would've evolved but left the planet before it gets burnt leaving the world to its desendants

the whole point of this debate is to create a parodox and see the replies it can't truely be answered but its a fun topic just like which came first the chicken or the egg it comes down to the arguments and the logic of the debate that is what makes it worth arguing obviously anyone who posts a coment has something to say otherwise they wouldn't post anything this is the point to see what people say to cope with a parodox

i wouldn't care to know when where how or why i died cuz then i would go a little crazy and probably end up fullfilling the prophecy of my death

see if i told you you would die in a year of paronoya then you'd say no i won't but it all ways be at the back of your mind slowly driving you into paranoya untill you die

of course man is racist we have to be better then someone else so as such we choose pointless criteria to judge on such as skin color which is just a result of genetic variation and we are all genetically the same species

you do know that the abiogenesis link firstly takes you to wikipedia and secondly is the study of the origion of life not an actual theory so according to you life began by studying how it began so life started once concious thought came and the early monkey thought hey i wonder where i come from so in essence life didn't come till after life began and as such we live in an exastentual existance which goes against the topic of this debate and as such holds no sway towards an answer or even addressing the topic and as such you might as well say

i think therfore i am

in any possible way i think you can take it its false

as a whole society is evolving ever changing and advancing

indavidually change habbits their minds their clothes their goals

and even genetically humans are evolving

life is change change is life

/\ i'm srry i'll need a translation of this

|

living alone is better then not living at all

"it isn't a pleasent thought. Especially if you're dead, really... ask yourself,if i asked you strait off--I'm going to stuff you in this box now,would you rather be alive or dead? Naturally, you'd prefer to be alive. life in a box is better than no life at all."--rosencrantz from the play rosencrantz and guildenstern are dead

the world is my box i choose to live

the only idea i got is that somehow water leached nessicerry chemicals from the rocks to create life but the water would've been highly acidic unsustainable to life based as we know it

well cloning humans is highlly controversial but i believe its because people lack education the same genetics don't make the same person it takes lives expiriences to make a person and they wouldn't grow to be identical in a few days it would take the same time in years but it could lead to issues genetically with crimminals but using cloning for genetical medicines could create infinate possibilities i'm for cloning but that doesn't mean we should let species go extint since we could just make a new one.

two more so what

2 words roundhouse kick